Tag Archive for 'religion'

Rights round up: 29th March 2009

Cops:

Because his brother serves in the Met­ro­pol­i­tan Police Geeklawyer is rarely shocked by UK police behav­iour: he sees them from the inside. There are far far too may idiots in the filth. It is these idiots that seem to be in charge of polic­ing the G20 protests. Appar­ently (via CharonQC) they are, they have said, “up for it” if vio­lence breaks out at the protests.

Yes­ter­day, the Met­ro­pol­i­tan police was under­stood to have con­tacted a num­ber of protest groups warn­ing that the main day of protest, Wednes­day, 1 April would be “very vio­lent”, and senior com­man­ders have insisted that they are “up for it, and up to it”, should there be any trouble.

Quite how, in the absence of a crys­tal ball, they know that Wednes­day will be ‘very vio­lent’, unless they plan to make it so, is unclear. The inevitable sus­pi­cion is that this is one pre­dic­tion that will become self-fulfilling. Geeklawyer is too young to remem­ber the Min­ers strikes of the 1980s but recalls the sto­ries of taunt­ing & provoca­tive police wav­ing their pay pack­ets in front of wage-less strik­ing min­ers. The ‘up for it’ lan­guage from police com­man­ders will cer­tainly have reached the well armed police grunts fac­ing pro­test­ers. This makes aggres­sion and provo­ca­tion against pro­test­ers almost inevitable. The Met for their part will then claim to have reacted ‘appro­pri­ately and pro­por­tion­ately’. Geeklawyer is bet­ting on how often the hyper con­tro­ver­sial Sec­tion 44 anti-terrorism pow­ers will be abused to crush peace­ful protest and harass those rude enough to want politi­cians to really really lis­ten to them.

Reli­gion:

Geeklawyer is no Islam­o­phobe, pre­fer­ring to despise all reli­gion equally, save Zen Bud­dhism and the Church of the Fly­ing Spaghetti Mon­ster. The news that the UN has passed a non-binding res­o­lu­tion mak­ing defama­tion of reli­gion a breach of Human Rights is truly appalling. Pak­istan was the spon­sor and the text says:

“Defama­tion of reli­gious is a seri­ous affront to human dig­nity lead­ing
to a restric­tion on the free­dom of their adher­ents and incite­ment to
reli­gious vio­lence,” the adopted text read, adding that “Islam is
fre­quently and wrongly asso­ci­ated with human rights vio­la­tions and
terrorism.”

But as The Ottawa rep­re­sen­ta­tive said: “It is indi­vid­u­als who have rights, not reli­gions,” which is man­i­festly right. Islamic loonies are their own worst ene­mies and this stuff plays into the hands of racists and US neo-con psychos.

Comic pr0n:

Neo-Labour’s obses­sion with leg­is­lat­ing about any­thing to with sex­ual moral­ity con­tin­ues apace. Fail­ure to under­stand the issues is not an imped­i­ment, of course, and if one can tag on the pedopanic label, well, how can one lose? The lat­est issue is that in a desire to leg­is­late against car­toon kiddy pr0n it may be that they will kill off mer­i­to­ri­ous art such as Manga or Alan Moore nov­els and derived films. Under this leg­is­la­tion it doesn’t even mat­ter if the rep­re­sen­ta­tion is of an adult if it also looks childlike.

Inter­nal travel pass­ports:

NO2ID are point­ing out that the gov­ern­ment will soon require you to have ID cards to travel within the UK if travel involves air or boats. How long before this is needed for train tick­ets an petrol pur­chases? All to com­bat ter­ror­ism of course.

Griev­ous insults:

Finally Geeklawyer has been hurt­fully described by Jeremy at the IPKat blog as the Jade Goody of the law blog­ging world. Prof Phillips was once a friend, but he is now dead to Geeklawyer. A law­suit for defama­tion is cur­rently being pre­pared by feared defama­tion ambu­lance chasers Messrs Carter Fuck.

Scientology and DDos attacks

Broadly Geeklawyer would say that Denial of Ser­vice Attacks were, and should be, crim­i­nal offences.

Ah yes, you say, a ‘but’ is in the air;

There has been a recent sus­tained attempt to remove this evil quack religion/business/multi-level-marketing-scam from the Inter­net by online vig­i­lantes who are engaged in DDos attacks.

Fuck­ing good job too. Sci­en­tol­ogy is the scummy scam prod­uct of the fraud­ster Ron L. Hub­bard who con­fessed to a friend that cre­at­ing one’s own reli­gion was a great way to make a for­tune. Geeklawyer would not, of course, encour­age assist aid or incite the com­mis­sion of any offence, except the mur­der of Tony Blair, but he remains sup­port­ive of their objec­tives. If they wish dogged vicious intractable and deter­mined pro-bono legal aid in the event of their cap­ture then they may have Geeklawyer’s ser­vices gratis.

On a side note, Tom ‘Loony Laugh’ Cruise has recently been widely mocked for his embar­rass­ing weird video that he has been try­ing to remove from the Inter­net because it demon­strates that not only is he a shit actor (Did you see “War of the Worlds”?) but a loony recruit­ment whacko for his pet cult. And he is, of course, not even slightly a closet homosexual.

Sharia law in the UK?

Geeklawyer doesn’t buy into the tabloid hys­te­ria about all things Islamic, but one repel­lent aspect of Islam is Shariah law with it’s bar­baric prim­i­tive and cretinous belief that cut­ting off the hands of thieves, ston­ing adul­ter­ers and coerc­ing women into ser­vil­ity is good.

So he was some­what hor­ri­fied that it should gain any mea­sure, even the mer­est toe­hold, of recog­ni­tion by UK law as pro­posed by the Mus­lim com­mu­nity. Their pitch starts of promis­ingly: “rad­i­cal Islam is a myth: we only want per­sonal law dealt with under Sharia, not penal or wor­ship law”. It then pro­ceeds at a rapid pace down­hill by assert­ing that by cut­ting off hands we could be a crime free soci­ety like Saudi Arabia.

Call him fussy but Geeklawyer will take the odd bur­glary or mug­ging rather than live in a despotic total­i­tar­ian hell-hole presided over by degen­er­ate racist oli­garchs who oppress their cit­i­zens’ civil lib­er­ties in order to main­tain their own wealth and power.

If he wanted all of that he’d vote New Labour.

British government complicit in torture

Tarek Der­goul is suing the British gov­ern­ment over com­plic­ity in his his tor­ture at Guan­tanamo by Amer­ica. The story is the usual one: Mr Der­goul like so many other vic­tims of the Evil Empire’s “War on Ter­ror” was in the wrong place at the wrong time. When the US offers a ‘no ques­tions asked’ large bounty on the heads of sus­pected Al Queda mil­i­tants then the first thing enter­pris­ing locals do is grass up inno­cent for­eign­ers in exchange for $5,000.

British cit­i­zens Moazzem Begg and Omar Deghayes suf­fered the same fate; mind you they were coloured, so obvi­ously there was a much stronger like­li­hood of their guilt than for a nice pretty look­ing mid­dle class white woman like Kate McCann.

MI5 & MI6 offi­cers who used the false work names of “Andrew” and “Matt” inter­ro­gated Der­goul. No-one is sug­gest­ing that they sex­u­ally abused him, or insulted his reli­gion, or beat him with base­ball bats, or sprayed pep­per spray directly into his eye­balls, or made him eat pork, or had a pros­ti­tute sex­u­ally humil­i­ate him, or forced him to stand blind­folded in a stress posi­tion for 18 hours until he shit himself.

No. These agents of the British state inter­ro­gated a fel­low British cit­i­zen, a cit­i­zen whom they had under­taken — and cer­ti­fied on his pass­port to do so, to pro­tect. Rather, hav­ing been fully aware of what was being done to him waited until it had been done and then took advan­tage of his ter­ror­ized con­di­tion to pur­sue ques­tion­ing in the hope that he was so weak­ened he might reveal if he was guilty or not. All in the inter­ests of national secu­rity of course; and the gov­ern­ment has uncon­di­tion­ally con­demned tor­ture. But not the inci­den­tals of tor­ture, it seems.

Andrew” and “Matt” should be pros­e­cuted. The gov­ern­ment should be held liable.

But Der­goul will fail. Mis­er­ably. All the way to House of Syco­phants Lords.

Photographic memory having lawyer bastards

Geeklawyer is going to annoy Ruthie, yet again, by talk­ing about her. The thing Geeklawyer hate most of all about Ruthie, and it is you may take it on trust a long long list, is that she remem­bers all our con­ver­sa­tions. All of them, in detail. It’s impres­sive but annoy­ing. She can quite cor­rectly tell him that he said she should not to post on reli­gion when he does a reli­gious post. Dammit, busted.

Geeklawyer remem­bers a bar­ris­ter who had a pho­to­graphic mem­ory. He would read a pile of bun­dles as high as him­self, then trun­dle into court and arrange them next to him and not open a sin­gle one in the entire trial. Not one, ever. And he would say:

My Lord on bun­dle X, Tab Y, at page Z in para­graph 230 on line 4 it says and I quote ‘…’ ”

He would do this repeat­edly on all points, even minor ones and not just for the legs of the case. Flash bastard.

Tomology: loony star — loony money — loony religion

Geeklawyer often wishes he was obscenely rich. Until that glo­ri­ous event comes to hap­pen he will have to set­tle for merely being obscene. And rich.

Buu­uut, then again. Look at Tom Cruise.

No really, do look or this post won’t make any fuck­ing sense.

Con­tinue read­ing ‘Tomol­ogy: loony star — loony money — loony religion’



 

February 2010
M T W T F S S
« Jan    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728