Tag Archive for 'pupillage'

Integrity at the Bar. Students beware.

Following a comment by Lawminx on an, unrelated, CharonQC post he and Simon Myerson QC ( a real QC rather than Charon’s humorous self appointment) both refer to the profoundly dubious Oxbridge Training Contracts organisation. This bunch of bottom-feeders aims to assist pupillage/trainee applicants to enhance their chances of a pupillage or a training contract by providing services that seem, in some cases at the very mildest, to be decidedly unethical either as the consumer of the service, or, for the contracted writer, the answer provider. Indeed if it is true, and one may reasonably doubt that it is not a fraudulent enterprise, that top barristers or pupils are writing the material to be used it may be they are at risk of being struck off for disciplinary breaches of the Bar Standards Board provisions on ethics.

If, as a student, tempted through understandable desperation, you consider using such a service Geeklawyer would say this: it is profoundly unlikely that they would equip you to survive the rigours of an interview. You may get a foot in the door but last no longer than the 30 minutes of forensic examination needed to show that you are a fraud. What if you can’t sustain the arguments in their writing because you are too dim or they are inept? Given the dire quality that Oxbridge Training Contracts material demonstrate you may spend thousands of pounds to get nowhere. Consider this piece of brilliant English, costing several thousand pounds one assumes, used to persuade chambers to interview you:

“I know from conversations that awards are taken with a degree of salt at Chambers”.

As Simon Myerson QC acidly, and rightly, observes one takes something with a pinch of salt. A degree of salt is taken in Media Studies, not in law.

The Barristers — episode four — the final act

The End. In so many ways, the end.

This episode saw the downward spiral of the 24 caret plonker Ickbal from what seemed to be the unbreachable all time low of previous episodes. Never missing an opportunity to show that he was as dim as he was egotistical he offered numerous dishes to camera.

In a crowning articulation of the perils of upward social mobility Ickybal tells us that as a child he’d never dreamt of aspiring to the Bar imagining he’d exhaust his career in a West Midlands coal mine. Geeklawyer felt that even that lofty goal was a little above him, but at least being at the Bar he would not have been able to cave the roof in on his colleagues. Precious little consolation to those of us who might trip over his ego in the robing room.

On being given a wig to wear (“Wow, I’ve got a big head!” being a rare moment of self awareness) he improvised to camera:  “My Lords I propose this case as a lot of bollocks.” Somehow one felt the inevitable anxiety that this was the exact and full quality of advice and advocacy that his punters would receive in his short lived career at the Bar before he retired to become an unlicensed cabbie in Birmingham: “I had that Lord Neuberger in the back of my cab the other day”.

Probably the highlight of his career was winning £271.32 from the Orange phone company as a litigant in person. Retarded Ikcbal proved well the adage that a lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client: £271.32 did, however, seem like suitable highpoint on which to end his career.

Bizarrely, though, there were even bigger fools than Ikcbal on display. And while Ikbal has the defence of a low IQ youthful exuberance and the demonstrated limited capacity to utter anything other than vacuous piffle David Wolf had no such excuse.

Mr David Wolf practically exuded “oil of ‘ism’” aftershave from his pores. Geeklawyer wondered how he ever got to chambers in the morning so deep must be his bowel loosening fear of treading on an innocent fly or looking at a woman in a sexist non-supportive way on the Tube. Mr Wolf spent most of the episode wringing his hands in tearful angst at the ghastly elitism of the Bar. Matrix Chambers, he proudly declaimed, was engaged in organising a revolt at the Bar by which the bastions of privilege would be overthrown by having different coloured areas of chambers to correspond with different areas of practice.

“See? Green headed chambers notepaper matches the green walled area of chambers; you know when you are in the ‘Right-On’ part of Matrix, where we fight for the underdog at a very reasonable £300/hour”.

Oh, and they don’t have pupils, they have ‘Trainees’ who don’t ask clerks for help, they ask ‘Practice Assistants’. Matrix Chambers can be found at Griffin Building, Gray’s Inn. When Geeklawyer says at, he means above. Matrix Chambers is suspended about 300 foot above the ground: levitated on a cloud of its own virtuous, but inclusive and mutually supportive, hot self righteous air. Rumour has it that this will be powering the next generation of Zeppelin Airships.

Our last sight of Howlin’ Wolf was his shocked tut-tuting at the pomp of a House of Lord’s decision that went against his punter and how jolly elitist and inaccessible it was to the man in the street. He was cut short by the camera before saying the hearing should really have been before the Shoreditch Workers Peoples’ Collective Court. Mr Wolf then departed to get a breakfast of organic muesli and soy milk.

It was not all bad however. The delicious Cat, who can sit on Geeklawyer’s lap any time, got a puppyledge at Keating Chambers in London; and the funny sounding Northern Lass got a pupillage and tenancy in Newcastle. Spiffy — she seemed fairly competent and Geeklawyer wishes her well.

But if the pupils, aspirants and tenants seemed like a bunch of cunts then Kakoly Pande saved the day for the Bar. She exuded pure 24 carat charisma. Clever pretty modest and talented she exhibited the sort of self-confidence talent and class that made one doubt that she would ever fail at the Bar; fail and wind up becoming a Solicitor-Inadequate at the minor Midland solicitors Frisbees or somesuch career graveyard. Faced with objections from junior tenants as to her prospective tenancy she gave what seems to have been a bravura performance and won them over. Their objection was less to do with her than the shortage of work at the Bar: a common theme throughout the series, and rightly so.

Again, the larger and more important policy driven skirmishes between the Government and the Bar were not explored. This is not a criticism: a program such as this would not perform too well by exploring these issues.

Overall the fourth episode maintained the weaknesses of the previous episodes in that it didn’t step beyond the photogenic. Nonetheless it made for good television: it was engaging and interesting if not as good a reflection of the reality of the Bar as it could have been. One wonders if the public are any the wiser; Geeklawyer wouldn’t know, he tries to avoid them wherever possible.

Deferred Call to the Bar

The Bar Standards Board has produced its provisional report on the annual “Shall we defer call?” question. There is a certain polarity of opinion on this from groups with their own agendas. Barristers in practice don’t want their professional status diluted with lots of wannabes who couldn’t get pupilages. The educational provides by contrast don’t want anything that diminishes the prospects of selling courses to as many hopefuls as they can.

Predictably Geeklawyer falls into the former group. Unfortunately the BSB falls into the latter. There recommendation was for no change to call but the introduction of a public register of barristers with practising certificates; also the pupils are to be referred to as ‘trainee’ barristers and to to have L-plates sown into the back of their gowns.

Part of the justification was that there seemed to be very little evidence of any actual misdescription problem: disciplinary records of the Bar Council disclosed that over 9 years only five out of 19 complaints that would be affected by the change were upheld, at Lincoln’s Inn in over nearly 20 years and 789 cases only two complaints were upheld. A Mori opinion poll disclosed that the vast majority of those sampled thought someone bearing the title barrister was entitled to represent them in court. The BSB seems to discount this as a potential risk not borne out in many cases — though they acknowledge they may not know the true scope of the problem since many will not complain.

The survey disclosed that one third of student thought the title to be important so clearly it would affect course providers marketing.

The report is fairly interesting and well worth a read.

 

Bar reform –pupillages and practice

Ruthie recently wrote about the Vos Review of entry to the profession and modes of professional practice. An interim report has now been published and the results are much as expected. While Geeklawyer is intimidated and afraid of Geoffrey Vos QC given his recent inquisition he feels that has to risk a Trip to the Basement. Some of the report is crap and some manifestly good.

The report mentions the perception that the Bar is too posh and Oxbridge; that those from a working class background are not sufficiently represented and there should be more of them. Geeklawyer is going to be controversial here: frankly he regards this as twaddle. He’s resigned to sharing his profession with the middle classes, but doesn’t see why the flying fuck he should have to put up with chavs: good heavens, we have Cherie Booth isn’t that enough? The tearooms will be filled with young men discussing football; driving to chambers in hot hatchbacks or scooters; Glaswegians becoming barristers and buying large houses in the West Country. Brhhh. A chilling thought.

While equal access is all jolly nice inclusive and makes us all feel cuddly gratified and warm, Geeklawyer thinks that there is a qualitative distinction between discriminating against someone based on gender or race and that that arises as a result of ones family not having economic power. Geeklawyer says “sorry geeze tough shit, life ruff ‘innit, an’ all that? Djya kna wot I mean?”.
Geeklawyer is quite happy to have diversity and it’s a good thing but distorting a profession and its rules for no other purpose seems like pandering. If you are talented and you or your family can afford to get you through the process great, otherwise you’re owed nothing. Least of by Geeklawyer. Deal with it & drive a truck or get a Vos bank loan to finance yourself.

The rest of the report is eminently sensible. The current system is a screwup and both Ruthie and Geeklawyer have commented ad nauseum on its inadequacies: people are driven by ambition into wasting huge sums on BVC courses when they have little prospect of a pupillage. Throttling back entrants by setting a 2.1 minimum is a broadly good idea but with a caveat: some very capable people currently practicing at the Bar have only 2.2’s losing the likes of them would be a shame. Academic degree class is a reasonable indicator of academic capability but not necessarily so good as an advocacy indicator. A better metric is needed and testing would be ideal. Realistically this is unlikely ever to happen so so long as one is going to choose a near arbitrary selection criteria it’ll do: so long as people who have a decent excuse for a 2.2 get a crack of the whip — those supporting a family while earning a degree etc.

Geeklawyer has a slightly more radical suggestion: make it easier for people to qualify by opening up capacity at the Bar by easing tenancy and pupillage rule. Make it possible for newly qualified barristers to set up their chambers so if they can’t get a tenancy they can operate from home or new sets; widen the approaches to providing pupillage (while maintaining training quality — natch). Have faith in the market — crap new lawyers sets will die if they are no good — if they are good they will get instructions & be able to pay the exorbitant rent most sets pay.

Right! that’s work out of the way

To Ruthie’s hilarity (and cruel mockery) Geeklawyer has had to do lots and lots of work this week. Frankly, he’s a bit pissed off about it.

Continue reading ‘Right! that’s work out of the way’

Barristers Guilty of Being Posh

Revelation of the week award goes to Geoffrey Vos QC, the new Chairman of the Bar, who worries that the future of the profession is being threatened by an emphasis on posh accents and a public school education instead of the highest intellectual standards. Mr. Vos said he hoped to persuade the Inns of Court to change the way they awarded grants to make it easier for people from underprivileged backgrounds to train. Candidates for the Bar Vocational Course from such backgrounds were often “completely missed” by grant authorities he said.

Continue reading ‘Barristers Guilty of Being Posh’

Dishonest QCs

Charon QC has been celebrating the demise of the celebrity chef. While bemoaning the dishonesty of chefs who delegate the menial labour of mere cooking to underlings, while said chef punches an innocent punter for the benefit of his reputation & attentive paparazzi, he makes a well intended but fatally flawed analogy:

Continue reading ‘Dishonest QCs’