Tag Archive for 'mad'

Extreme client care?

Couldn’t help but wonder what Dan Hull would have made of this story (via the excellent Inner Temple news site) about a lesbian stalker who is now detained under the Mental Health Act after harassed a chick solicitor.

Ms (and she is surely a ‘Ms’) McGrath was initially a client of the Johnson Partnership in Nottingham. She then began phoning following and writing to Miss Eardley for a prolonged period, culminating in her hiding behind the curtains at Ms Eardly’s house where she was found wrestled to the ground by a passing boyfriend and then arrested.

One hates to say it but one can’t help feeling that it may actually be Ms Eardley at fault here. Clearly a vulnerable client did not receive the sort of no-limits ‘Balls to the Wind’ client care that WAC? would have provided. Geeklawyer speculates that the correct approach would have been for Ms Eardley to provide a lesbian solicitor to cater to Ms McGrath’s ‘needs’. And for goodness sake, think of the billable hours here: how many letters & phone calls at £x/hour? The behind the curtains incident would surely count as a conference with a massive antisocial hours uplift?

Frankly, Ms McGrath’s assertion that: ’ “She’s a rubbish solicitor. She’d be better off working in the Co-Op.” ’ may have some substance. Those lost billables will hopefully be reflected in her annual bonus.

Professional Humiliation

In the aftermath of the knob-head Bruce Hymen matter it was a little hard for us to maintain the presentation that the Bar was a litigation priesthood of unimpeachable morals. Visible public humiliation of professionals — the modern fashion for transparency, aka Tabloid Food — was inevitable.

Nonetheless, the implementation seems a bid odd. Minor stuff is not made public nor stuff related to medical problem: drunkenness etc which seems reasonable. On the other hand while Serious stuff is on there forever, and less serious stuff is subject to a Rehabilitation of Offenders style provision and removed after two years, accusations of incompetence and inadequate service don’t go on there at all.

This is surely the value of such a thing to punters? knowing when a Barrister fucked up sufficiently to be disciplined or queried about fitness to practice and thusly to be avoided seems useful.

If you’re going to have such a gimmick at least make it useful.

You don’t have to be mad to work here 2 ..

Tip of the hat to Liadnan for alerting Geeklawyer to this valiant attempt by Mr Justice Peter Smith to wrestle the award of “Looniest Judge Ever” away from its current holder, Philippino Judge floro.

Smith J got wrapped up in a court case where he was confronted by a firm of solicitors, Addleshaw Goddard, to whom he had made an unsuccessful proposal for a venture. This might not necessarily be a problem but the judge seems to have taken some offence at AG’s rejection. The problem began when AG asked the judge to recuse himself from a case where they were on the record as solicitors. He declined. They made an application before him for him to recuse himself, on the grounds of non-impartiality, and supported it with his own emails and an examination in chief of the partner who had rejected him.

You can probably begin to see how this might get to be bizzaroworld meets AngryCity. And you would be right.

With evident hostility the judge began to cross examine the witness and give his own evidence from the Bench.

MR CRAMPIN: Having had an unsuccessful discussion or negotiation with Addleshaws, your lordship expressed yourself in strong – intemperate, almost — anguish.

MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH: Nonsense. I don’t know what part of the country you come from, Mr Crampin, but it’s about time you grew up. If you think that’s intemperate, then you are on another planet from me. If you thought it was intemperate, then you should have seen the correspondence which didn’t trouble Mr Twigden.

MR CRAMPIN: I’m endeavouring to make a submission, not to engage with your Lordship in badinage of that kind. The question that a fair-minded person –

MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH: I’m challenging you, Mr Crampin, on your analysis, when you suggest that my correspondence was intemperate. I don’t accept that.

MR CRAMPIN: Well, it’s a submission, my Lord –

MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH: Well, I have rejected it. I’ve just told you.

MR CRAMPIN: I don’t think your Lordship is actually going to pay attention to anything further I say on this subject. Your conduct of the matter in the court today is remarkable. My submission to your Lordship …

MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH: I’m not going to comment on that, Mr Crampin. It does not dignify a comment

MR CRAMPIN: I’m making the submission that I am.

MR JUSTICE PETER SMITH: If you’re going to say that, you’d better say it with specificity, or you’d better withdraw it, or there might be professional consequences.

MR CRAMPIN: Your Lordship can take whatever course you’d like to take.”

Needless to say the Court of Appeal had a word or two to say.

One imagines that any aspirations Smith J. had of elevation to the Court of Appeal have been deflated.

Geeklawyer believes that several Mystic Dwarves were seen leaving the court giggling as they headed back to the Philippines. Judge Floro remains undisturbed as head loony but it was a good attempt by Smith J.

Update.
It would seem His Lordship may soon have more time to spend on his CV

You don’t have to be mad to work here..

Think your judge is mad? Judge Florentino V. Floro Jr of the regional trial court in Malabon City managed to remain in office for seven years despite changing his blue court robes to black every Friday to “recharge his psychic powers” and professing the assistance of three invisible dwarf friends named Luis, Armand and Angel…