Tag Archive for 'legal advice'

Dear Geeklawyer

This is the inaugural column of “Agony Uncle” Geeklawyer. Geeklawyer, to his astonishment, receives a huge postbag of pathetic begging requests from readers with nowhere else to turn. Ever willing to humiliate the desperate Geeklawyer deigns to answer these via his new column.

Mr C Writes: “I am a law lecturer at an elite private further education college for 16–18 year olds. Unfortunately my grades at university were embarrassingly poor: I got a 2.1 in Politics Philosophy and Economics from a northern university. I am desperately keen to get to the Bar or even, at a pinch, a Magic Circle Law firm. I read, on such august websites such as “Pupillage and How to Get It”, such tales of woe that my heart sinks. Can you advise me on how to rise to the top of the legal profession?”

Dear “C”:

First of all Geeklawyer would congratulate you on the two most valuable qualities in any lawyer: aspiration, determination, detachment from rational objectivity and numeracy. Well done, you are almost half way to being a Solicitor Inadequate, if no further toward the height of the profession: the Bar. Geeklawyer does not suggest that there is anything wrong with being a solicitor: on the contrary people will always need conveyancing done, or a defense rendered on a speeding charge. But you have loftier aspirations and on such things are ambition built.

You have a number of problems in your aspiration to be the next Attorney General. Social progress is a wonderful feature of the modern egalitarian age. The days when having a mother who slopped out piss-buckets for the local squire’s garden parties was a bar to social advancement are over. Many say that this is a good thing and Geeklawyer offers no opinion. Or at least none other than to ask, meaning no disrespect to your mother, into whose bucket does one piss if there is no decrepit pockmarked old hag around? Perhaps that is a little churlish and so Geeklawyer will say no more.

But what is, is. Your mother has spent 40 years emptying party urine for your future. She must feel that you are due a reward. Sadly, Geeklawyer thinks that you suffer from the malaise so often seen in this egalitarian age: being good and succeeding are not enough. And of course since your went to a ‘Northern University’ are you really up to the Bar?

The Bar is for gentlemen: gentlemen with good firsts from good universities. Perhaps you should consider becoming a solicitor? So many failed barristers take this option nowadays that it barely retains any stigma at all. And recall that an associate City solicitor will make more money than most barristers. If one comes from a poor background such mundane financial considerations are so much more relevant than style, as they should be.

My first suggestion would be to snag a bit of posh totty to provide social camouflage. Then do another degree and get a brilliant double first; follow this with an equally brilliant masters and a seminal doctoral thesis.

Get your new wife’s family the outrageous BVC fees and then tell a decent set of chambers, say Blackstone, that you require a pupillage and a tenancy at their earliest convenience; for heavens sake do this politely since many chambers are remarkably snotty with uppity BVC students, heaven alone knows why.

Spend your first few years defending chav burglars or possession applications and then make ask the Department for Constitutional affairs if they’d be good enough to make you a QC. After that your path to the bench is assured, Geeklawyer understands.

C’: you’ll agree that this is obvious advice, and the best advice usually is. Should you elect to become a solicitor Geeklawyer will be terribly disappointed but you can still become a proper lawyer: later in your career when you are a position to retire from partnership, and with your career connections in place, you can dabble at the Bar as a hobby, insulated from the poverty. Many chambers welcome ex-solicitors for their client connections.

Welcome to the Middle class.

Nonetheless, you have not impressed Geeklawyer with your commonsense and he suggests that you stick to banging rich 17 year old girls in exchange for ‘A’ grade A level marks. Fuck knows he would were he a loser like you.

Are you a member of the legal  profession with a problem an older more unpleasant colleague can help with? If so email Geeklawyer at geeklawyer [at} gmail dot com

Lawblog 2007 report

Geeklawyer was a little apprehensive about the UK and Europe’s first legal bloggers conference. Would it be well attended? would it get support? would people find the content to be useful and would the social networking work?

Yes.

Caveats exist on the delight both Geeklawyer and Ruthie felt about the results: it was a little small, though this was down to the still small size of the legal blogging community, something that will change in future years; and several desirable bloggers failed to show up; trying to co-ordinate the diaries of more than two lawyers is usually a nightmare so the fact that we managed it for thirty is an achievement in itself, but inevitably some academics such as Martin fell victim to exam marking, pupilblogger & Liadnan fell prey to clerks and Corporate Blawg collapsed under the weight of numerous client files suddenly being heaped unannounced on his head.

Nonetheless, these were merely small clouds on an otherwise sunny and clear blue sky. Several members of both the general and trade press were present so we hope that the evangelical component of the conference will achieve its goal of greater awareness and uptake of lawyer blogging in the UK.

Several speaker commented on the mixed objectives of bloggers. CharonQC spoke of the egotists ranters anarchists serious commenters and marketing departments; and the horrors inflicted by errors such as the infamous Watson Farley Williams debacle; and he provided a taxonomy of blogging.

Geeklawyer spoke of the four main dangers of blogging for lawyers: professional misconduct, the Google eternal memory problem, malicious commenters and lack of blog upkeep. He also discussed the acquisition and control of co-bloggers.

Justin Patten led what ended up as quite interesting question and answer session on such things as the goals and objectives of blogging as well as the risks.

Ruthie talked about her life as a blogging sidekick. Inevitably much of this was biased propaganda presenting her twisted agenda and deluded grievances; no-one, it seemed to the more balanced Geeklawyer, was fooled for a moment.

Ruthie caused a significant amount of disappointment by not turning up in her famous pink leather motorcycle jacket citing its weight and the heat. A rather glorious Chinese smoking jacket, while in other circumstances sensational, failed to be an adequate substitute for the leching lawyers present. She presented her plan for a Ruthie calendar for next year and merchandise like t-shirts mugs and leatherware. Lacking any concept of discussion she disclosed some gossip about Geeklawyer’s initial inability to manage her effectively as a blogger (guilty). She said that while she was not anonymous she didn’t exploit the blog as a marketing opportunity and eschewed providing free legal advice. She also commented on the disappointing inevitability of sexual discussion in a post making it massively and enduringly popular.

Perhaps the surprising hits of the conference were Headshift Consultancy and Professor Jeremy Phillips of IPKat. Of all the conference attendees Geeklawyer was most nervous of Headshift because of their content. They emailed him when they heard of the conference and Geeklawyer thought they were doing something that sounded interesting. The trouble is that being a bit of a geek Geeklawyer has a distorted value and interest system and perhaps, just perhaps, this geeky stuff attracts him in a way it may not or should not do for anyone sensible: like lawyers. Headshift discussed the use of social networking to provide resources within large firms and organisations using easy existing software Wikis social bookmarking tagging and blogs. They described how quickly built projects costing next to nothing radically changed knowledge sharing and workflows in several prominent law firms, outperforming vastly more expensive software that took ages to develop. Geeklawyer knew all the technology well but hadn’t considered its use in this way. He found it to be a revolutionary idea and it genuinely has made him look at whether he can adopt this on a lesser scale for his own needs. To his astonishment several other lawyers said to him afterwards, unbidden, how interesting this talk was and what revolutionary ideas it revealed.

Professor Jeremy Phillips was the other great surprise: Geeklawyer had of course read his blog on innumerable occasions and took it as the product of a heavyweight and austere intellectual. In reality Jeremy was funny friendly and polite. He told the rather impressive story of the creation and growth of IPKat, and he was a highly engaging speaker.

Geeklawyer has attempted to persuade IPKat to cast him its unwanted news tips.

There should be MP3’s of the conference at some point: but the audio quality of Geeklawyer’s recordings is a bit poor: it sounds like the sermon on the mount recorded from half a mile away, against the wind and with a huge discontented audience.

Update:
Eeek!

outsourcing in-house IP

While something of an oxymoron, the outsourcing in-house IP work article from ipupdate also raises, for city & specialist firms, some uncomfortable future prospects. Continue reading ‘outsourcing in-house IP

who should own commissioned software?

Over at Naked Law the Cambridge boys are chewing the Clearspring gristle. This is a classic contract negotiation problem to IT lawyers: who gets the code copyright? Continue reading ‘who should own commissioned software?’