Archive for the 'crime' Category

Page 2 of 10

Terrorist not really a terrorist says loony psycho, terrorist friendly, terrorist judge

Published on 22 February 2008 in crime, politics and terrorbollocks. 24 Comments

Geeklawyer, along with his mates at the keepblairforpm website, have long decried the ‘enemy within’: the lawyers liberal meeja, and judiciary who have a secret agenda to undermine our beloved land of St George.

These scum would compel us to wake at 6.30 every morning and turn to face Mecca and worship Satan, or ‘the Prophet Mohammed’ as muslims prefer to call him.

Now, this heavenly mission is being frustrated by a traitor in their midst. A judge, so low than one can barely refer to him as “Justice” Collins, has deliberately released an undoubtedly guilty man knowing full well that he intends, following one lawyer’s site’s advice, to assassinate Tony Blair, the Queen, all of Parliament and the every child at the School for Handicapped Children at Hailsham East Sussex.

It is political correctness gone mad Geeklawyer says.

Is that mp3 player loaded?

Published on 14 February 2008 in crime and terrorbollocks. 6 Comments

Geeklawyer chuckled somewhat when he read to Metro story about some poor chump who made the mistake of holding his black mp3 player with both hands causing some nervous nellie to think it was a pistol. Much panic was then caught when he was arrested at gunpoint after police chased the bus down. As he was listening to music he couldn’t hear their challenge and reached for the player to turn it off so he could hear. How that didn’t end up in him being shot is hard to fathom. He is clearly the luckiest man in London. Lucky he isn’t a Brazilian electrician, or a Muslim.

What was outrageous was that having reased what was going on the police still insisted on arresting him and taking his DNA which will now be kept permanently along with a record of his arrest for suspected arms offence. Nice.

Thought policing nailed by the Court of Appeal

Published on 14 February 2008 in crime and terrorbollocks. 5 Comments Tags: , , .

There are a lot of nutjobs out there: Simple Sam, BlairSupporter and any number of Islamic loonies. Many of them are undeniably potentially dangerous but the Court of Appeal’s decision to remove the criminalisation thought and ‘mere preparatory’ acts from the Terrorism Act 2000 has to be applauded.

From now on there has to be a need to show an intent to do something. Just downloading or sharing something nasty or silly from the Internet isn’t enough. The law was presaged on the intent of the police to criminalize documents that might radicalise Muslim youth. Like most knee jerk legislation it wasn’t really thought through: it as never going to ‘nip in the bud’ any supposed radicalization process but it did criminalise curiosity and research. As is usual it was picking at symptoms rather than dealing effectively with the real but hard issues.

Scientology and DDos attacks

Published on 25 January 2008 in crime and deranged ranting. 4 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Broadly Geeklawyer would say that Denial of Service Attacks were, and should be, criminal offences.

Ah yes, you say, a ‘but’ is in the air;

There has been a recent sustained attempt to remove this evil quack religion/business/multi-level-marketing-scam from the Internet by online vigilantes who are engaged in DDos attacks.

Fucking good job too. Scientology is the scummy scam product of the fraudster Ron L. Hubbard who confessed to a friend that creating one’s own religion was a great way to make a fortune. Geeklawyer would not, of course, encourage assist aid or incite the commission of any offence, except the murder of Tony Blair, but he remains supportive of their objectives. If they wish dogged vicious intractable and determined pro-bono legal aid in the event of their capture then they may have Geeklawyer’s services gratis.

On a side note, Tom ‘Loony Laugh’ Cruise has recently been widely mocked for his embarrassing weird video that he has been trying to remove from the Internet because it demonstrates that not only is he a shit actor (Did you see “War of the Worlds”?) but a loony recruitment whacko for his pet cult. And he is, of course, not even slightly a closet homosexual.

Sharia law in the UK?

Published on 21 January 2008 in crime, politics and religion. 12 Comments Tags: , , , , .

Geeklawyer doesn’t buy into the tabloid hysteria about all things Islamic, but one repellent aspect of Islam is Shariah law with it’s barbaric primitive and cretinous belief that cutting off the hands of thieves, stoning adulterers and coercing women into servility is good.

So he was somewhat horrified that it should gain any measure, even the merest toehold, of recognition by UK law as proposed by the Muslim community. Their pitch starts of promisingly: “radical Islam is a myth: we only want personal law dealt with under Sharia, not penal or worship law”. It then proceeds at a rapid pace downhill by asserting that by cutting off hands we could be a crime free society like Saudi Arabia.

Call him fussy but Geeklawyer will take the odd burglary or mugging rather than live in a despotic totalitarian hell-hole presided over by degenerate racist oligarchs who oppress their citizens’ civil liberties in order to maintain their own wealth and power.

If he wanted all of that he’d vote New Labour.

Barristers strike

Published on 21 January 2008 in crime, legal profession and the Bar. 2 Comments Tags: , , , .

Geeklawyer fully supports his criminal colleagues in refusing to sign their new legal aid contracts. Respect to Simon Myerson and all the others.

Question: does this mean that unrepresented defendants could potentially have their cases dismissed for lack a lawyer? Bad very bad. But presumably all these cases will be adjourned until the mess is sorted out. Hopefully the Government will get it’s wallet out instead
of trying to fuck the Bar.

“Collins referred to meetings of barristers and reports of pressure put on barristers not to sign, which he warned could amount to a criminal offence under anti-cartel competition laws.

Barristers deny that any pressure has been exerted, and say the decision is down to the individual. Hugo Charlton, who asked the Met to investigate, said Collins’ letter could be interpreted as suggesting that barristers who joined a bid would be committing a criminal offence if they did not go on to sign the contract.”

Con and chips please — no vinegar

Published on 15 January 2008 in Civil liberties & human rights and crime. 8 Comments

Geeklawyer notes, wearily, as does the rest of the world, the government’s latest techno wheeze for solving crime: inserting chips into criminals.

A few short years go we were told that electronic tags would solve the menace of innocent not-yet-convicted people committing new crime while on bail and also reduce prison overcrowding by allowing non-custodial options. All one had to do was make them wear a tag & then a private company could track their movements and enforce restraint orders. It worked so brilliantly the government was forced to find a new magic bullet. Of course this one really really will work this time, honest.

From a technological perspective chips seems, like ID Cards, to be another techno-fantasy that hasn’t been thought through. The chips are only the size of a couple of grains of rice and they are buried under the skin. The idea is that this will prevent removal or interference. Frankly
Geeklawyer doubts it. It will certainly be hard for Wayne the chav, in his housing association hovel, to cut it out, but it remains vulnerable to others. Firstly — as with tags one merely needs to wrap it in a Faraday Cage; tin foil or wire mesh would probably work fine. Hoiking them out would probably be doable. And, finally, the chip can be blatted out of existence with a 5 second microwave burst from any £15 dongle purchasable at a DIY electronics store.

There is talk of using them as a GPS device too. Again the fantasy is that the police can track the location of a con at any time. Bollocks. GPS devices are a long long way from being small enough to integrate into a rice grain sized subcutaneous transmitter. So you’re back to an ankle bracelet; like, errr …, the ones that are currently broken.

And once one has been acquitted of a charge or served ones sentence is it removed? Or is it a mark of Cain that any any employer can detect at a job interview with a private scanner?

The whole idea is a fucked up fantasy from ACPO. ACPO is a target of Geeklawyer’s hate to an extent matched only by Tony Blair and neo-Labour.

Why do these people hate democracy?

Published on 12 January 2008 in crime and terrorbollocks. 34 Comments Tags: , , , , , , , .

Geeklawyer was outraged by the conduct of protesters outside the US Supreme Court. They were protesting about the Guantanamo bay Freedom camp. This is perplexing. There, undoubted terrorists are firmly fairly and gently encouraged by well trained compassionate counsellors to come to terms with their evil, and to repent and assist in the fight against terror. Who would protest about that?

Dirty liberal hippy troublemakers, that’s who. Fortunately 81 of these swine were arrested and hopefully will be making their way to join their colleagues in Guantanamo really soon.

No paying for sex?

Published on 22 December 2007 in crime. 5 Comments

Harriet Hymen is saying that we really should not be paying for sex and it should be illegal. Well, OK what she is saying is that there should be a ‘dialogue’. When a government Minister says “let us have a dialogue” you know full well that a decision has been made, and the dialogue is about how, not whether, to implement it.

It is true that there is a problem with trafficking girls for sex work and that some girls are trapped into doing it the question is what the true extent of the problem is: sure the government says it is an extensive problem but Geeklawyer distrusts the governments motives and wonders if there is there any independent evidence?

And what is ludicrous is the feminist twaddle underlying it: men & all the clients are deliberate evil exploiters, the poor girls are all victims. Which is crap. Unpalatable as it may be to the ‘right on’ feminists many women wholly voluntarily engage in prostitution: chav girls with no other earning potential, impoverished students all of whom know full well what they are doing. Their clients are committing no crime in taking the services on offer; nor does it seem likely that they usually know when they are using a coerced sex-worker.

Hymen is trying to create a victim culture and pick easy targets. What, you’re surprised?

Hate speech is fun, but hate music is even better

Published on 7 December 2007 in Civil liberties & human rights and crime. 3 Comments Tags: , , , , , , .

Sodom and Gomorrah by Sea, or ‘Brighton’ as its inhabitants have nicknamed it, has a problem with hate music. It seems that the council is concerned that those members of the right sort of minority group need protecting from being mocked by members of the wrong kind of minority group.

Apparently my Nigga Homies are dissin’ fags. Geeklawyer will pause now to check with his younger cooler friends to see whether this is correct ‘yoof’ street speak.

[pause]

Apparently not, but it is supposedly comprehensible, if barely.

The UK Blawgosphere has been positively on fire recently with at at least two people attempting to wrestle VictorianMaiden into a straightjacket (an insane job with her 10 petticoats plus bustle) after commentators made the fundamental mistake of pointing out that one really really really could justify using the words “free speech” and “anti-zionist” in the same decade let alone the same paragraph.

With trepidation, therefore, Geeklawyer offers a lit match to a bucket of petrol on this story.

Brighton counsel council have said that since the Lord Chancellor has seen fit to desert not only existence but his moral duty to safeguard the, err, morals of the nation by no longer censoring plays and musical theatre they will step ‘once more unto the breach’. Of course the law doesn’t permit this, so what’s a self appointed moral guardian to do? Why, of course, use ancillary legislation and hope no-one knows how to say ‘it’s ultra vires, baby’. The irrelevant legislation being, of course, public entertainment/drinking establishment licensing policy.

None of this is necessary. Where hop-hip, morris dancing and Chamber Music ensembles incite the heady passions of audiences with inflammatory lyrics, they can be charged with the standard Neo-Labour criminal charges of ‘thought crime’ and not ‘being an approved person’.

Denoting it as ‘murder’ music is as transparently manipulative and phoney as renaming french fries ‘freedom’ fries.