There was an interesting article in the Guardian: MI5 dont want unlawful filesharers cut off the Intarwebs. This, it seems, will encourage people to use encrypted internet connections. That, in turn, will make it harder for them to spy on law-abiding citizens. The concern is that people currently using bit-torrent, Usenet or hosting services like Rapidshare will use secure SSL connections to prevent their own ISPs spying on what they are downloading. While many believe that the spooks at GCHQ can break SSL encryption if they throw enough CPUs at it, it is believed to need a serious amount of horsepower and so only worthwhile for high interests targets: non-white UK citizens, civil liberties troublemakers, the communications of friendly governments, plus ministers domestic emails.
Under proposed government legislation ISPs will be compelled to rat-out their customers to the US movie and record industries. A pretty unsavoury thing to do but this government has had a long and illustrious history of compelling companies and professionals to act as spying arms of the state. The quaint practice of banking privacy is a warm distant memory, like that trip to Brighton Races in a Ford Model-T; gone because the government needs to fight these new 21st threats of what are being called ‘crime’ and ‘terrorism’. Shocking inventions of the modern age: of course personal privacy and trust must yield to the state’s need to see everything we do in order to make us safe. Yes.
This is a classic example of the law of unintended consequences. One bunch of government sleazebags (Peter ‘Pink Mandy’ Mandelson) want to make political capital but in doing so it hampers another bunch of government sleazebags also looking to make political capital: MI5 looking for ‘Product’ (in spook jargon) to sell to ministers.
In the meantime the Open Rights Group have a thing or two to say about government Internet disconnection policies.
If Council of Europe get their way in talks over telcoms package — then EU law will enshrine cutting people off and without adaquate due process, as our MEPs who have voted to maintain that need to have a court order are now backing down, and the CoE are trying to get rid of as much due process as possible. This is where the real battle is, not here in uk (at moment). http://www.informationoverlord.co.uk/?p=310