Couldn’t help but won­der what Dan Hull would have made of this story (via the excel­lent Inner Tem­ple news site) about a les­bian stalker who is now detained under the Men­tal Health Act after harassed a chick solicitor.

Ms (and she is surely a ‘Ms’) McGrath was ini­tially a client of the John­son Part­ner­ship in Not­ting­ham. She then began phon­ing fol­low­ing and writ­ing to Miss Eard­ley for a pro­longed period, cul­mi­nat­ing in her hid­ing behind the cur­tains at Ms Eardly’s house where she was found wres­tled to the ground by a pass­ing boyfriend and then arrested.

One hates to say it but one can’t help feel­ing that it may actu­ally be Ms Eard­ley at fault here. Clearly a vul­ner­a­ble client did not receive the sort of no-limits ‘Balls to the Wind’ client care that WAC? would have pro­vided. Geeklawyer spec­u­lates that the cor­rect approach would have been for Ms Eard­ley to pro­vide a les­bian solic­i­tor to cater to Ms McGrath’s ‘needs’. And for good­ness sake, think of the bill­able hours here: how many let­ters & phone calls at £x/hour? The behind the cur­tains inci­dent would surely count as a con­fer­ence with a mas­sive anti­so­cial hours uplift?

Frankly, Ms McGrath’s asser­tion that: ’ “She’s a rub­bish solic­i­tor. She’d be bet­ter off work­ing in the Co-Op.” ’ may have some sub­stance. Those lost bill­ables will hope­fully be reflected in her annual bonus.