Geeklawyer & Ruthie at Glastonbury - a video reprise

Ruthie lies about me giving her tea in bed and doesn’t get the point of the infamous hoody:

These videos are on their side: Geeklawyer was not stoned, honest;

For some readon the Wurzel’s “I’ve got a rand New Combine Harvester” sent Ruthie to sleep.

Related Post

RSS feed | Trackback URI

13 Comments »

Comment by lo-fi
2008-07-03 22:31:54

Are you wearing chinos?

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-07-03 22:35:59

Dunno. Would it be hip or naff? Decide my answer based on your answer.

 
 
Comment by the lady robinson
2008-07-04 06:50:11

Did Ruthie buy the hat at Glasto? She’s very together in her commentary. Did you take all the drugs?

Geeky, just hearing your voice again… :wink:

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-07-05 00:28:24

If she sounds fluent it is merely because I fed her easy lines.

Yes yes, I have the voice of a silk throated angel, an angel with huge nuts, I know. It’s tough to be as great as me.

 
 
Comment by lo-fi
2008-07-04 07:25:40

I think it would be naff. Good beard work though.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-07-04 11:58:00

Yes, stick on beard.

 
 
Comment by juxtajazz
2008-07-04 10:29:17

Good lord, lovely and I’m jealous. Oh well. there’s always next year. :wink:

 
Comment by Moon23
2008-07-04 11:28:15

Meh… Moon will be at the edgy and exciting illicit climate camp http://www.climatecamp.org.uk/ scoring all corporate festivals with a sense of self righteous indignation. Still it looked good fun though

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-07-04 12:02:56

But what fun will this Climate Camp be without the Cider Bus and ‘Cunt’ Hoodies? What will you New Puritans do for laughs?

 
 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-07-05 21:05:03

lawyers in ’sad’ shock

 
Comment by lawminx
2008-07-08 13:20:26

Why does the Hoodie, coupled to the fact that said garment after a week’s SOLID wear, probably now has a life of its own, not surprise me?! :shock:

PS: After all my (non) grovelling, I STILL didnt get a mention in your blog review!! ( * throws massive tantrum* :evil: )

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-07-08 14:05:09

If you’ve read the post you will understand that Blawg Review aren’t happy ‘cos practically no-one else was in it either - it was, justly, criticised for being too short. You aren’t alone. But I will still hide from you if you turn up to Lawblog 2008!

 
 
Comment by lawminx
2008-07-08 15:02:47

Oh, :twisted: I think I’ll be able to spot you, somehow…….( I wonder why??!)

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.