<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blawg Review #166</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "limpet"</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-21014</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "limpet"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 01:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-21014</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged limpet Blawg Review #166&#160;saved by 4 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;karimimisora1614 bookmarked on 07/14/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] bookmarks tagged limpet Blawg Review #166&nbsp;saved by 4 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;karimimisora1614 bookmarked on 07/14/08 | [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20939</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20939</guid>
		<description>If winegums will passify you then that GL can do; that and some videos that have been posted to you today (never underestimate the cost efficiency of Royal Mail v Internet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If winegums will passify you then that GL can do; that and some videos that have been posted to you today (never underestimate the cost efficiency of Royal Mail v Internet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20937</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20937</guid>
		<description>I didn't harrass you about Canada Day (it's July 1st btw) since most Canadians tend to be fairly passive about it.. none of that hoopla that Yanks go for with regards to their July4th festivities.

But since it was brought up I demand some winegums from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t harrass you about Canada Day (it&#8217;s July 1st btw) since most Canadians tend to be fairly passive about it.. none of that hoopla that Yanks go for with regards to their July4th festivities.</p>
<p>But since it was brought up I demand some winegums from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20915</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20915</guid>
		<description>Dont' let Scott upset you. He's just nasty for a living.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont&#8217; let Scott upset you. He&#8217;s just nasty for a living.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkworthy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20913</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkworthy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20913</guid>
		<description>[...] Blawg Review #166 is up at GeekLawyer, and if you&#8217;re offended by the content, you&#8217;re probably in good company, since he appears to be an equal opportunity offender. Let&#8217;s just say this is one time I was pleased to be ignored. According to Colin Samuels, &#8220;Those of you who are just discovering him now will . . . not be bored. Scandalized perhaps, but not bored.&#8221; Ed. at Blawg Review does a supplement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Blawg Review #166 is up at GeekLawyer, and if you&#8217;re offended by the content, you&#8217;re probably in good company, since he appears to be an equal opportunity offender. Let&#8217;s just say this is one time I was pleased to be ignored. According to Colin Samuels, &#8220;Those of you who are just discovering him now will . . . not be bored. Scandalized perhaps, but not bored.&#8221; Ed. at Blawg Review does a supplement. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20896</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20896</guid>
		<description>Hey, it works don't knock it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, it works don&#8217;t knock it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20895</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20895</guid>
		<description>Bloody barristers, turn up late and throw over papers clearly cobbled together out of panic and a few of their old precedents, then demand credit for the previous month's work. And we let them, because otherwise they get all unhappy and a little bit tearful, and we have to make 'there there' noises. I am told that they use the same tactic in their private lives too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody barristers, turn up late and throw over papers clearly cobbled together out of panic and a few of their old precedents, then demand credit for the previous month&#8217;s work. And we let them, because otherwise they get all unhappy and a little bit tearful, and we have to make &#8216;there there&#8217; noises. I am told that they use the same tactic in their private lives too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mediation Channel » Europe seizes control of Blawg Review</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20890</link>
		<dc:creator>Mediation Channel » Europe seizes control of Blawg Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 18:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20890</guid>
		<description>[...] now, smashing into Blawg Review like an nuclear blast or a particle beam death ray, comes Blawg Review #166, detonated by an anonymous English barrister known only as GeekLawyer. Replete with foul language [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] now, smashing into Blawg Review like an nuclear blast or a particle beam death ray, comes Blawg Review #166, detonated by an anonymous English barrister known only as GeekLawyer. Replete with foul language [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin OKeefe</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20878</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin OKeefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 01:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20878</guid>
		<description>I think I should say thanks for sharing word of LexMonitor. We're still working hard get out of the Scott Greenfield 'ugly baby' category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I should say thanks for sharing word of LexMonitor. We&#8217;re still working hard get out of the Scott Greenfield &#8216;ugly baby&#8217; category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the naughty step &#124; Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/07/01/blawg-review-166/#comment-20877</link>
		<dc:creator>On the naughty step &#124; Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=961#comment-20877</guid>
		<description>[...] that the award was only received due to the unreasonable delay of Geeklawyer in delivering his Blawg Review (caution NSFW and likely to leave you pleasured but having lost all self-respect), it seemed [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] that the award was only received due to the unreasonable delay of Geeklawyer in delivering his Blawg Review (caution NSFW and likely to leave you pleasured but having lost all self-respect), it seemed [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
