Comments on: Podcast 14: Ruthie drops in on Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:01:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20615 Geeklawyer Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:52:11 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20615 They ain't my biatches theyz ma hoes. They ain’t my biatches theyz ma hoes.

]]> By: james c http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20614 james c Sun, 01 Jun 2008 19:45:51 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20614 My Dear Geek, Your bitches seem to like it,Daddyo. My Dear Geek,

Your bitches seem to like it,Daddyo.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20613 Geeklawyer Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:53:04 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20613 You make it sound such a shallow thing to do. You make it sound such a shallow thing to do.

]]> By: james c http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20612 james c Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:51:27 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20612 My Dear Geek, You were probably talking street to impress the chick lawyers. My Dear Geek,

You were probably talking street to impress the chick lawyers.

]]> By: Lawgirl http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20611 Lawgirl Sun, 01 Jun 2008 16:03:55 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20611 "washing powder causes the death of baby seals"? what an ingenious male excuse for being a filthy little whorebag. Geeklawyer. I expected better of you! “washing powder causes the death of baby seals”?

what an ingenious male excuse for being a filthy little whorebag. Geeklawyer. I expected better of you!

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20610 Geeklawyer Sun, 01 Jun 2008 06:17:12 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20610 Cerebral?! bwahahaha. Very good. Cerebral?! bwahahaha. Very good.

]]> By: Charon QC http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20608 Charon QC Sat, 31 May 2008 22:26:24 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20608 Fuxtons? Fuxtons?

]]> By: james c http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20607 james c Sat, 31 May 2008 21:32:11 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20607 I had thought you were more cerebral. I had thought you were more cerebral.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20606 Geeklawyer Sat, 31 May 2008 18:35:10 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20606 Because? ... Because? …

]]> By: james c http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/05/30/podcast-14-ruthie-drops-in-on-geeklawyer/#comment-20605 james c Sat, 31 May 2008 16:23:18 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=953#comment-20605 My Dear Geek, You sound like a pair of Fulham estate agents having a drink. My Dear Geek,

You sound like a pair of Fulham estate agents having a drink.

]]>