<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Royal blackmail victim wont go into the witness box &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20264</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20264</guid>
		<description>This blog offers a name:

http://thebluedogspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/04/gay-royal-scandal.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog offers a name:</p>
<p><a href="http://thebluedogspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/04/gay-royal-scandal.html" rel="nofollow">http://thebluedogspeaks.blogspot.com/2008/04/gay-royal-scandal.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20158</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20158</guid>
		<description>Historically homsexuality was pretty much mandatory for all the royal houses: Queen Victoria was reputedly a minge muncher when she wasn't tossing Scottish gamekeeper caber.

Of course while there is nothing wrong with being gay however much society advances that can be no excuse for being royal, it's just unnatural and sick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Historically homsexuality was pretty much mandatory for all the royal houses: Queen Victoria was reputedly a minge muncher when she wasn&#8217;t tossing Scottish gamekeeper caber.</p>
<p>Of course while there is nothing wrong with being gay however much society advances that can be no excuse for being royal, it&#8217;s just unnatural and sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20157</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20157</guid>
		<description>You don't mean hair in the singular of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t mean hair in the singular of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helga Hansen</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20156</link>
		<dc:creator>Helga Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20156</guid>
		<description>Hhmmm... wonder if said Royal will come out of his own closet eventually? :D  I wonder why they find the need to hide the (so-called) shame? It's not as if previous Royals haven't been caught with their pants around their ankles, doing naughty things, before, is it?

Anyway, there's always Oprah! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hhmmm&#8230; wonder if said Royal will come out of his own closet eventually? <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  I wonder why they find the need to hide the (so-called) shame? It&#8217;s not as if previous Royals haven&#8217;t been caught with their pants around their ankles, doing naughty things, before, is it?</p>
<p>Anyway, there&#8217;s always Oprah! <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20123</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20123</guid>
		<description>Dear Sylvia

Don't misunderstand me - I've been an addict of your splendid blog for a long while now and was merely meaning that your ranting saves me the bother of venting my own spleen :)

Anyway, with regards the DDOS attack I'll take my lead from the 11/9 conspiricists and suggest that you clearly carried out the attack yourself as a shameless publicity stunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Sylvia</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t misunderstand me - I&#8217;ve been an addict of your splendid blog for a long while now and was merely meaning that your ranting saves me the bother of venting my own spleen <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, with regards the DDOS attack I&#8217;ll take my lead from the 11/9 conspiricists and suggest that you clearly carried out the attack yourself as a shameless publicity stunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20118</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20118</guid>
		<description>Sylvia Berlosconiti will do as good a job as he did before. But your ranting needs work: the last guy I pissed off DOSed the site into a black-hole and called the filth in on me. &lt;i&gt;That's&lt;/i&gt; what I called talented ranting. Of course he was an octogenarian nutjob - is that ageist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sylvia Berlosconiti will do as good a job as he did before. But your ranting needs work: the last guy I pissed off DOSed the site into a black-hole and called the filth in on me. <i>That&#8217;s</i> what I called talented ranting. Of course he was an octogenarian nutjob - is that ageist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20117</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20117</guid>
		<description>Dear GL,
Could this be your last blog entry now that they've asked you go go back and run Italy again?  Congratulations and all that, but don't forsake us - this ranting by proxy facility has been most good for my blood pressure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear GL,<br />
Could this be your last blog entry now that they&#8217;ve asked you go go back and run Italy again?  Congratulations and all that, but don&#8217;t forsake us - this ranting by proxy facility has been most good for my blood pressure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: youbytin</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20109</link>
		<dc:creator>youbytin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20109</guid>
		<description>It will be wonderful if the world is harmonious for both gay and straight people even lesbian, bisexual and transgender.As far as I know, many LGBT don't mind ther straigh people coming to know their life. take those bisexual at Bimingle.com . They are kind to other straight people to. Welcome them to their lives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will be wonderful if the world is harmonious for both gay and straight people even lesbian, bisexual and transgender.As far as I know, many LGBT don&#8217;t mind ther straigh people coming to know their life. take those bisexual at Bimingle.com . They are kind to other straight people to. Welcome them to their lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mary</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20108</link>
		<dc:creator>mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 00:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20108</guid>
		<description>Having spent some time with Ruthie in late January/early February I was given a rundown on several "characters" such as yourself dearest Charon. I somehow was given the impression that you'd look quite fetching in these http://www.ninewest.com/n/browse/product.s?productId=2939566&#38;source=category&#38;index=2&#38;prodIndex=2&#38;listSize=90&#38;categoryId=2981827&#38;codeName=NWJASLEY

Though maybe Geeklawyer could pull them off, with his hair fluttering in the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spent some time with Ruthie in late January/early February I was given a rundown on several &#8220;characters&#8221; such as yourself dearest Charon. I somehow was given the impression that you&#8217;d look quite fetching in these <a href="http://www.ninewest.com/n/browse/product.s?productId=2939566&amp;source=category&amp;index=2&amp;prodIndex=2&amp;listSize=90&amp;categoryId=2981827&amp;codeName=NWJASLEY" rel="nofollow">http://www.ninewest.com/n/browse/product.s?productId=2939566&amp;source=category&amp;index=2&amp;prodIndex=2&amp;listSize=90&amp;categoryId=2981827&amp;codeName=NWJASLEY</a></p>
<p>Though maybe Geeklawyer could pull them off, with his hair fluttering in the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/04/14/gay-royal-blackmail-victim-wont-go-into-the-witness-box/#comment-20107</link>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 22:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=933#comment-20107</guid>
		<description>Is woodworking a euphemism for a 'stiffy', GL?

I've always found it amusing when the middle classes refer to invitations on white card  as 'stiffies'. And then they put their stiffy on the mantle piece for all to see.  I do wonder about the sanity of our country sometimes.

Well... off now to read a book in the vain hope that a veneer of civilisation will assist me....

Ever eager for news - I did a Google search. One assumes, that one is allowed to do Google searches even in these credit-crunch times?

Apparently, the trial is set to last for 4-5 weeks. 
http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jAzJzWWZHAfxUWiejkLWp8TY81iQ

Probably as plane as day to those of you who spend your days in the criminal courts.

***

Mary:  I had no idea that Charles liked Diana's heels.  Good stuff -  something we, the people of Rome, can identify with.  Not into heels myself - but, if I had a Mrs Charon, I would certainly encourage her to feel free to ask me if I'd like to go to The Bollo in a Darth Vader outfit.  Not every night, you understand.... the sight of someone dressed up as Darth Vader, drinking Rioja through a straw and grabbing wine bottles by the neck,  might be just a bridge too far for some of the topers at that establishment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is woodworking a euphemism for a &#8217;stiffy&#8217;, GL?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve always found it amusing when the middle classes refer to invitations on white card  as &#8217;stiffies&#8217;. And then they put their stiffy on the mantle piece for all to see.  I do wonder about the sanity of our country sometimes.</p>
<p>Well&#8230; off now to read a book in the vain hope that a veneer of civilisation will assist me&#8230;.</p>
<p>Ever eager for news - I did a Google search. One assumes, that one is allowed to do Google searches even in these credit-crunch times?</p>
<p>Apparently, the trial is set to last for 4-5 weeks.<br />
<a href="http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jAzJzWWZHAfxUWiejkLWp8TY81iQ" rel="nofollow">http://ukpress.google.com/article/ALeqM5jAzJzWWZHAfxUWiejkLWp8TY81iQ</a></p>
<p>Probably as plane as day to those of you who spend your days in the criminal courts.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Mary:  I had no idea that Charles liked Diana&#8217;s heels.  Good stuff -  something we, the people of Rome, can identify with.  Not into heels myself - but, if I had a Mrs Charon, I would certainly encourage her to feel free to ask me if I&#8217;d like to go to The Bollo in a Darth Vader outfit.  Not every night, you understand&#8230;. the sight of someone dressed up as Darth Vader, drinking Rioja through a straw and grabbing wine bottles by the neck,  might be just a bridge too far for some of the topers at that establishment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
