<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More daft eco crap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:12:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bloggs</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19912</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19912</guid>
		<description>Less of the Police Community Non-Support Officer business!  :wink:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less of the Police Community Non-Support Officer business!  <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=':wink:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19906</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19906</guid>
		<description>well i think they haven't gone far enough and should remove the wheels of all cars to stop the emissions and then we can all sit here and wonder what exactly we are doing;

policy 2 is to firebomb all thsoe effers with massive fucking cars - it's not as if they actually need the car to let us know they are stupid selfish gits is it?


(one of these policies i would actually vote for)

and next we have charon telling us why we shouldn't laugh ourselves into a coma when he says he's going to vote for doris!
(sorry i have been driven insane by trying to produce a meaningful effort on the current state of copyright in the uk - perhaps dreamed up by ken...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well i think they haven&#8217;t gone far enough and should remove the wheels of all cars to stop the emissions and then we can all sit here and wonder what exactly we are doing;</p>
<p>policy 2 is to firebomb all thsoe effers with massive fucking cars - it&#8217;s not as if they actually need the car to let us know they are stupid selfish gits is it?</p>
<p>(one of these policies i would actually vote for)</p>
<p>and next we have charon telling us why we shouldn&#8217;t laugh ourselves into a coma when he says he&#8217;s going to vote for doris!<br />
(sorry i have been driven insane by trying to produce a meaningful effort on the current state of copyright in the uk - perhaps dreamed up by ken&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moon23</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19904</link>
		<dc:creator>moon23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19904</guid>
		<description>How else are they meant to fund the replacement for trident?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How else are they meant to fund the replacement for trident?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19899</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19899</guid>
		<description>I dont have a problem with reducing car usage: far from it but my objection is using ecological justifications to disguise or justify a tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont have a problem with reducing car usage: far from it but my objection is using ecological justifications to disguise or justify a tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moon23</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19897</link>
		<dc:creator>moon23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19897</guid>
		<description>I won't lose much sleep over 4x4’s are being charged a £25 fee. Although it is a bit arbitary what does or doesn't get an extra 'green tax' slapped on it. Perhaps there could also be a bit of carrot as well as the stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t lose much sleep over 4&#215;4’s are being charged a £25 fee. Although it is a bit arbitary what does or doesn&#8217;t get an extra &#8216;green tax&#8217; slapped on it. Perhaps there could also be a bit of carrot as well as the stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19896</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19896</guid>
		<description>Yes; Caroline Quim, the final answer to the question &lt;i&gt;"is untrammeled free speech a good thing?"&lt;/i&gt;. Hint: no. Fuck no, are you fucking  serious dude?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes; Caroline Quim, the final answer to the question <i>&#8220;is untrammeled free speech a good thing?&#8221;</i>. Hint: no. Fuck no, are you fucking  serious dude?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19895</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19895</guid>
		<description>Oh dear Lord, a right wing Texan agrees with me. How fucking scary is that. Though I did appreciate your humorous dilemma &lt;a href="http://grayraven.com/JimNtexas/?p=389" rel="nofollow"&gt;over voting
Clinton-v-Obama&lt;/a&gt;: tactical voting at its finest, welcome to my world baby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh dear Lord, a right wing Texan agrees with me. How fucking scary is that. Though I did appreciate your humorous dilemma <a href="http://grayraven.com/JimNtexas/?p=389" rel="nofollow">over voting<br />
Clinton-v-Obama</a>: tactical voting at its finest, welcome to my world baby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19894</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19894</guid>
		<description>"More CCTV cameras; more 50k a year consultants; committees to promote transgender education; more hedge threatening police Community non-Support Orifices (PCSOs)."

Geek, I think you've just inadvertently written Ken's election manifesto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;More CCTV cameras; more 50k a year consultants; committees to promote transgender education; more hedge threatening police Community non-Support Orifices (PCSOs).&#8221;</p>
<p>Geek, I think you&#8217;ve just inadvertently written Ken&#8217;s election manifesto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nearly Legal</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19893</link>
		<dc:creator>Nearly Legal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19893</guid>
		<description>Ah the wonderful Caroline Flint strikes again.

http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/caroline-flint-speaks-her-brain/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah the wonderful Caroline Flint strikes again.</p>
<p><a href="http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/caroline-flint-speaks-her-brain/" rel="nofollow">http://nearlylegal.co.uk/blog/2008/02/caroline-flint-speaks-her-brain/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Howard</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19892</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Howard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/03/25/more-daft-eco-crap/#comment-19892</guid>
		<description>I loved your rant, you'd fit right in with us right wing wacko Texans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved your rant, you&#8217;d fit right in with us right wing wacko Texans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
