<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 21:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19697</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19697</guid>
		<description>Let's be honest. There is no such thing as an innocent accused man. If they were innocent why did the police charge them? Do people imagine the police have nothing better to do?

To paraphrase Judge Turpin: "Even if those men have been hung for something they didn't do, it's to to be sure they've done something to merit a hanging."

I love the Sun, it's almost like a newspaper, but with pictures of breasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s be honest. There is no such thing as an innocent accused man. If they were innocent why did the police charge them? Do people imagine the police have nothing better to do?</p>
<p>To paraphrase Judge Turpin: &#8220;Even if those men have been hung for something they didn&#8217;t do, it&#8217;s to to be sure they&#8217;ve done something to merit a hanging.&#8221;</p>
<p>I love the Sun, it&#8217;s almost like a newspaper, but with pictures of breasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not a Criminal Lawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19696</link>
		<dc:creator>Not a Criminal Lawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19696</guid>
		<description>Presumably the Sun takes the view that it is better for 100 innocent men to die, than for one guilty man to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Presumably the Sun takes the view that it is better for 100 innocent men to die, than for one guilty man to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19698</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19698</guid>
		<description>that's why some poeple hate human rights - because even the people we don't like get them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s why some poeple hate human rights - because even the people we don&#8217;t like get them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ms Robinson</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19701</link>
		<dc:creator>Ms Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19701</guid>
		<description>And the interesting thing about those who call for the death penalty is that they actually would want to choose who could die. For if you said to them, "Has it occurred to you that it would apply to your sons if they got in with a bad crowd?" they would shrink back in horror that it could be universally applied.

It is of course Rebekah fuckwit Wade's gimmick to ingratiate herself with the Murdoch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the interesting thing about those who call for the death penalty is that they actually would want to choose who could die. For if you said to them, &#8220;Has it occurred to you that it would apply to your sons if they got in with a bad crowd?&#8221; they would shrink back in horror that it could be universally applied.</p>
<p>It is of course Rebekah fuckwit Wade&#8217;s gimmick to ingratiate herself with the Murdoch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19700</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19700</guid>
		<description>They were Sun journos but yea Daily Nail too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were Sun journos but yea Daily Nail too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19699</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/25/justice/#comment-19699</guid>
		<description>Jeezus GL - that's a bit inequitable even for you.  How can you justify excluding Daily Mail journos like that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeezus GL - that&#8217;s a bit inequitable even for you.  How can you justify excluding Daily Mail journos like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
