<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thought policing nailed by the Court of Appeal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 02:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Sorry Tale of the Archbishop, the Lawyer, and the Blair supporter &#171; Tony Blair</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19534</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sorry Tale of the Archbishop, the Lawyer, and the Blair supporter &#171; Tony Blair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19534</guid>
		<description>[...] course he applauds wholeheartedly the release this week by Appeal Court judges of five young men who downloaded literature from the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] course he applauds wholeheartedly the release this week by Appeal Court judges of five young men who downloaded literature from the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19533</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19533</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bailii.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Bailii&lt;/a&gt; is the first stop if you don't have professional law reports available</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bailii.org/" rel="nofollow">Bailii</a> is the first stop if you don&#8217;t have professional law reports available</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19532</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19532</guid>
		<description>That's a worry to be sure, but I shall take heart, nonetheless, at a step in the right direction.

IANAL: when/where would the judgment be published? I'd be interested to cast my eyes over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a worry to be sure, but I shall take heart, nonetheless, at a step in the right direction.</p>
<p>IANAL: when/where would the judgment be published? I&#8217;d be interested to cast my eyes over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charonqc</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19531</link>
		<dc:creator>charonqc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19531</guid>
		<description>It was a pretty robust view... I have only read press reports, however,  not the judgment....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a pretty robust view&#8230; I have only read press reports, however,  not the judgment&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19530</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19530</guid>
		<description>They are talking of an appeal to the House of Lords which is much more executive minded than the CA. Common sense is not yet assured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are talking of an appeal to the House of Lords which is much more executive minded than the CA. Common sense is not yet assured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Musings of Harry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Down with thoughtcrime!</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19529</link>
		<dc:creator>The Musings of Harry &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Down with thoughtcrime!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19529</guid>
		<description>[...] Geeklawyer picked up the excellent news that Court of Appeal has overturned the convictions of several young men who downloaded extremist material from the internet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Geeklawyer picked up the excellent news that Court of Appeal has overturned the convictions of several young men who downloaded extremist material from the internet. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19528</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/02/14/thought-policing-nailed-by-the-court-of-appeal/#comment-19528</guid>
		<description>Splendid news! Nice to see the judiciary coming through.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Splendid news! Nice to see the judiciary coming through.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
