Unquenchable fires and Blair

It seems that some things burn eternally and cannot be extinguished by the efforts of mere man: the underground coal fire that rages in Pennsylvania that has burnt for 46 years and is still going strong; or the obsession of Geeklawyer’s growing band of female stalkers (and the odd male one we’ll gloss over quickly).

All of these pale beside the ambition of the ex-Dear Leader. Having buggered up the country nicely by creating new breeding grounds for hatred of the West, and gifted an entire generation of angry young English Muslim men to radicalism; having launched us into a supporting role in retarded George’s democracy tour of the Middle East - critically panned by Rolling Stone magazine; having eradicated at a stroke vast swathes of the civil liberties he said were the reason we were a great liberal democracy superior to the terrorist values; having trashed the Health service into a semi-privatised profit centre for health companies and which employs reams of highly paid middle-managers whose function is to churn out empty statistics about the great improvements and, well, you get the point. Blair is a oily sleazy little runt; a failed barrister with a chip on his shoulder that would save the Amazon.

But of course all that was supposed to be over with his exit from power. Oh blessed day when the clouds parted and the rain retreated to be replaced by the mild drizzle of the chubby, absolutely heterosexual, thingy … Gordon Brown, Google informs Geeklawyer.

We have been conned. Bliar has not had enough. With his obscenely lucrative rewards for doing a bad job, you’d think he’d be happy rolling around on £50 notes on his king sized bed with that fat arsed minger Cherie (embarrassingly, a member of Geeklawyer’s Inn). £250,000 a pop US speaking gigs, £1Mil a year for a part time job, £6Mil book deal.

No. Apparently now he wants to bugger up the EU too by becoming PM of the EU. Eeeeek. He’s been caught lunching the almost equally repellent French clothes horse PM Nicolas SadDozy at the Paris restaurant Thiou. A word of warning SadDozy: avoid doing deals with Bliar in restaurants. Ask Gordon.

Thiou are famed for an exotic meat and noodle concoction known as ‘le tigre qui pleure‘ (the tiger who cries). In honour of the oily one’s visit can Geeklawyer suggest a new dish? “The Voter Who Weeps“. Geeklawyer’s French is too poor to render that into French - in French he can only say “Get off my ski lift you Nazi-collaborating frog eating Gallic tampon or Geeklawyer will have coprophilic sex with your disgusting wife after he’s bathed her and made her shave her armpits“.

Why oh why oh why oh why can’t the useless rag-head pillocks in Al Queda assassinate him? It would be great PR for them: many of us would revise our low opinion of them if they could do us this one small service. Their ineptness is proof that the terrorism ‘threat’ is laughable.

update: Some idiot is trying get Geeklawyer prosecuted. Hilarious! Please read the blog, please, it is absolutely frigging hysterical. I’ve never seen a political stalker before but I think that that is what this person is. He has no interest in politics and is a right wing loony. From his poor inarticulate writing and weak arguments he is clearly not very bright and is manifestly poorly educated - ideal Neo-Labour fodder. I am assuming, from the tone, that the interest in Tony Bliar is a homosexual one.

Related Post

RSS feed | Trackback URI

89 Comments »

Comment by theladyrobinson
2008-02-04 00:43:38

http://www.mediainfluencer.net/

Hey Evil Brother, we are Almost Famous. Read what she said under 31/1/08. Yours is better than mine but I share your glory.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 10:55:38

Nice. Is she influential?

 
 
Comment by BlairSupporter
2008-02-04 01:09:30

Are you for real? :twisted: A REAL barrister? If so, the country’s had it, clearly. You’d be entitled, even if you hadn’t reached a certain intellectual standard, to rant and rave like an uneducated uncouth sod if you must … though what’s happened to Lincoln’s Inn these days is beyond comprehenesion, but please … please do not encourage this:

“Why oh why oh why oh why can’t the useless rag-head pillocks in Al Queda assassinate him? It would be great PR for them: many of us would revise our low opinion of them if they could do us this one small service. Their ineptness is proof that the terrorism ‘threat’ is laughable.”

:evil:

It’s disgraceful behaviour.

Blair is a political genius and a good man. Responsible people shouldn’t call for anyone’s murder, whether we like them or not.

Is that too simple for you to grasp?

You really need to watch your language.

Comment by Dan
2008-02-04 22:25:12

Judging from this guy’s writing I’d say he knows nothing about Law or Politics. He seems to forget that Blair won three mandates from the people.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:16:34

Who else would one have voted for in 1997? Given Tory sleaze and corruption (Oh, the irony) if you’d put a red roset on a pig he’d have won. Oh hang on, they did and he did.

2001: William 10-pints-a-night Haig? Bzzz, no.
2005: Howard. You can see where I’m going with this can’t you?

As for law I have a grade ‘C’ GCSE and a 3rd class law degree from Newcastle Polytechnic, as it was. I think my law-talking credentials will stand up without the aid of a lectern.

 
 
 
Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 08:56:49

A neo-Labour supporter!! And one who’ mastered typing. How sweet, I thought you’d all had your mind-control chips switched off by Central Office when Bliar slunk away.

And you have retained the sycophantic reflexes of his era: “political genius and a good man”. You arse hat. No-one with an ounce of credibility or analytical skills regarded him then or now as either a genius or good. At best he did nothing. Nothing good for law and order, nothing for the economy, nothing good for international relations, or peace or etc etc. As for a genius? Perhaps ‘Yo Blair‘ looked good compared to his boss George, but most reports I’ve heard say that his aren’t exactly the fastest firing neurons in the West: it was no coincidence he didn’t get a tenancy after his pupillage.

“though what’s happened to Lincoln’s Inn these days..” I assume like the ex-Dear Leader you are a failed barrister too?

It would certainly explain your inability to distinguish, on the one hand, having an opinion and a wish that some idiots regard as a offensive and, on the other, inciting or calling for an offence to be committed. So, I am afraid that your, classically Neo-Labour, threats are baseless. Even the political genius ex-Dear Leader didn’t propose criminalising opinion.
Though that was only because the crook was ejected from office in the nick of time.

 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-04 10:34:25

oh dear, geek - you have been taken in! i worry for the bar as a whole and your own career when you ignore the evidence - you look without seeing and are wise only in your folly.
comment 1 is entirely ironic - ignore the circumstantial evidence that nobody who has heard of events on this planet over the last ten years and can actually make it to a keyboard without their autonomous processes failing from sheer idiocy could have believed the sentiments above (and you really need a new sense of humour if you think anyone can still say ‘Blair is a political genius and a good man.’ without an immediate irony overload). you yourself found the key evidence: ‘A neo-Labour supporter!! And one who’ mastered typing.’ it is clearly one of the infinite number of monkeys not destined to produce shakespeare, but who managed this joke instead.

it’s lovely that, 20 something years later, my own outrage at the brighton bombing that the stupid bastards missed thatcher, should return in that form. terrorists are shite. perfectly capable of hitting a massive building oh yes (unless we believe the CIA did it) but can’t get a weedy nerd sitting in downing street.

and much kudos to BlairSupporter - an elegant and simple way to get a net name that they are absofuckinlutely shitearsebastard certain NOBODY will have picked. loud applause. it is only by minding one’s language you can do things like that.

ps ‘arse-hat’ is delightful. so much better than its us cousin ‘ass-hat’. mind if i use it when mooting?

and a joke of my own:
knock knock
who’s there?
tony
tony who?
tony blair
fuck off.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 10:45:36

Very good - you got me. An ironic comment about ironic comments: for a moment I thought “oh fuck did I miss the …” :lol:

 
 
Comment by theladyrobinson
2008-02-04 12:30:15

Apparently Saint Tony’s French has mysteriously improved beyond all recognition in the past two months. The only way that happens is if you have a French lover… (Ugh, what a horrid thought).

 
Comment by james c
2008-02-04 13:17:06

My Dear Geek,

Tony and Cherie seem quite peculiar. Do you think that they may be suffering from the long-term effects of practicing the rhythm method?

Poor Tony can hardly know whether he is coming or going.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 15:02:45

I don’t know if they practice the rhythm method or not (I’ll ask the next time I see Cherie dining at Lincoln’s) but I doubt it: I seem to recall Blair was as inept a guitarist as he was a politician.

But in any event if you had to fuck Cherie I doubt you’d be able to cum at all. In fact an erection would be a miracle; perhaps he closes his eyes and thinks of Maggie?

 
 
Comment by anon
2008-02-04 13:30:02

With his obscenely lucrative rewards for doing a bad job,

Wake up Geek lawyer. He’s been massively underpaid for doing a good job. The US taxpayers and US dollar holders are funding the occupation to the tune of USD 8 billion per month, last time I checked.

 
Comment by Jenny
2008-02-04 13:55:18

Not that I wish to argue with anything you’ve said, but how *exactly* is a very big chip supposed to save the Amazon?

Comment by moon23
2008-02-04 14:33:38

You obviously have never learnt to appreciate the many subtitle and mysterious powers that chips have.

 
Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 15:00:44

By providing a plentiful supply of wood. Thus obviating the need to plunder the Amazon. See? :razz:

 
 
Comment by moon23
2008-02-04 14:31:44

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! i’m applying to join UKIP.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 15:05:41

Hang on Moon23 don’t get things out of proportion. Even Blair as EU president doesn’t make things that bad.

 
 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-04 14:46:14

‘Tony and Cherie seem quite peculiar.’ Beautiful!
are you doing awards for understatement, geek?

 
Comment by theladyrobinson
2008-02-04 16:32:59

Oh dear GL I just read the blog. I may be wrong but it sounds and looks like a school project…one that originated in the Midwest somehwere.

this is too funny :smile:

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 17:22:14

Isn’t it just? Say what you like, the great thing about the Internet is democratisation. Now everyone can see what working class morons think not just their employers.

50 years ago this fellow would have been cutting my lawn. Now he’s attempting to argue a point in public, for all the world to see. It’s very encouraging, but also depressing in that it shows how far we have to still to go.

 
Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 17:30:51

There even appear to be idiots who agree with him :shock: Scroll down for comments by Noddy and Campbell. Jesus can someone please close down their bit of the Internet please? Thanks

 
 
Comment by the lady robinson
2008-02-04 17:30:16

No he would have been eating your lawn

 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-04 18:22:02

i don’t wish to be blinkered in my view of the beauteous lady r - cos she’s a)powerful b)hawt and c)nice to me, but i assume the eating the lawn thing is sexual, right?

and another thing i have only just realised about tony’s pal above. (s)he used emoticons in a really serious way. is it just me or is that plain weird? i mean would you put them in a skeleton?

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 19:32:54

I am drafting a skeleton as we speak - I shall try it on for size:

“2. The Claimants say that the first Defendant was in breach of Clause 2 of the Agreement :( and that thereby they suffered significant damage :evil:

Hmmm, yea, worth a go I reckon. What’s the worst that could happen?

 
 
Comment by Ann
2008-02-04 18:22:09

Oh dear. If that prosecution threat blog is not an elaborate troll, the Onion and all such sites that parody the absurdities of society shall have to give up as reality is more bizarre than imagination can manage.

 
Comment by Fink Floyd
2008-02-04 18:52:22

Absolutely hilarious. I love the way they have a go at ‘liberals’ one minute and then say your mind has been polluted by the Daily Mail. I didn’t realise we had neo-cons in Britain, but it seems there are.

Is there potential for fun here, do you think? Perhaps a wee message left to stir a little might provide additional hilarity…GL, thoughts?

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 19:00:08

He seems to be attracting enough similar idiots to keep him happy. Anyway I won’t stoop to conversing with a retard - I get enough of that in court - sorry Your Honour, I didn’t realise you were standing there.

 
 
Comment by theladyrobinson
2008-02-04 19:05:48

I shall send him my bikini pic. That will appease him.

See what I do for you Evil Twin. And what do I get? Miserable midnight phone calls from tearful young women. :roll:

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-04 19:16:11

I suspect that he is an unwilling homosexual and that your rather nice bikini picture will send him into paroxysms of loathing and repressed desire - he will then either masturbate himself (over a picture of Tony of course) or rape someone. Don’t do it - some weapons are too lethal to deployed for such idle fun.

The midnight phonecalls are my treat to you - a gift of vulnerable young ladies to be toyed with, mauled and destroyed. You love doing that so cut out the pretense.

 
 
Comment by Fink Floyd
2008-02-04 22:43:52

I’m afraid I cracked and added to the debate on his blog…see if you can spot it, though I doubt it’ll survive moderation.

One of them mentions that he sent you an abusive email…will you share? I could do with a laugh.

 
Comment by Usefully Employed
2008-02-05 00:22:48

Damn - came across this bunfight a bit late in the day, that’ll teach me to be drunk all weekend.

If anyone else’s jaw has dropped reading these obsessive morons’ half-baked views, then I can thoroughly recommend the following:
http://ifyoulikeitsomuchwhydontyougolivethere.com/ - BBC Have Your Say weirdos
http://www.fstdt.com/fundies/top100.aspx?archive=1 - Christian FundaMENTALISTS

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:23:36

Excellent - have added the Have Your Say’ one to my blogroll.

 
 
Comment by Charon QC
2008-02-05 03:56:38

Ah…Geeklawyer. I see that you have been very busy being contumelious….

I had no idea, until I visited the Blair Supporter / TonyBlair for President etc etc blog tonight, that you were “a completely obnoxious self important nonentity.” Have you had a makeover for daytime television?

The poster of those fine words drives the point home by expressing the opinion….” I suppose that’s what makes him so envious of Blair, eh?”

Are you envious of Blair?….

Excellent nonsense…. I am going to buy a bag of popcorn.

Will you conduct your own defence ?

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 05:44:18

“a completely obnoxious self important nonentity.”: Well, even Rain Man can get some things right.

And yes I do envy him Cherie - I can live the lie no longer; the sagging bottom, the droopy breast. Mmmmmm.

 
 
Comment by Charon QC
2008-02-05 04:09:24

Mon dieu…

I’ve just been back to the Blairsupporter website. He wants to hang you… it seems?

He writes:

“But I’m sadly coming to the conclusion that we need to bring back capital punishment and start using it here at the top of the British legal profession.”

GL… How tall are you…. what is your weight?

Anyway… just thought I would ‘drop’ in…..

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:26:10

My weight with or without wig?

 
 
2008-02-05 04:34:40

[…] In the Blue corner In the Red corner […]

 
Comment by the lady robinson
2008-02-05 08:20:19

Oh god, no Charon, tell them not to hang him. It will be like something out of Balzac, with all these hysterical young things falling down everywhere.

I can’t take the phone calls anymore Evil Brother: one of them has asked me about blow job technique, saying you were not pleased.

 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-05 10:34:23

well if he wants to reintroduce capital punishment for the legal profession, maybe i could begin to warm to him. let’s face it, geek, if we have to lose you in order to get rid of legover lennie, ms booth, mr blair, mansfield - even you would have to argue that your existence (or as it happens otherwise) has taken on a the exciting possibility of great benefit to mankind. pour encourager les autres? go on…
and it would leave some nice tenancy gaps for me in 2010.
though my entire purpose is selfless.
and i think “a completely obnoxious self important nonentity.” is pushing it a bit. with all this attention, you are clearly no longer a nonentity.

ps look on the bright side: if you do go for the long drop, at least there will be a friendly face on the boat thereafter. how fitting that a QC should conduct the souls of the departed on their way.

think the smiley skeleton is clearly the way forward. wasn’t it actually proposed somewhere in the woolf reforms to give the law a more human face?

 
Comment by anon
2008-02-05 10:46:52

Here’s Tony doing is thing for Britain.

 
Comment by lawminx
2008-02-05 11:00:03

* Sits back in Comfy Chair and stuffs face with Chili Natchos and half a bucket of buttered popcorn* OOO this is far FAR better than any Ding Dong in Court!! :mrgreen: :lol:

 
Comment by Usefully Employed
2008-02-05 11:15:26

This story may cause some brains to implode over there.
http://www.thelawyer.com/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=131072

 
Comment by moon23
2008-02-05 12:42:42

Dear GL,

You should follow the example of fine upstanding citizens of the Met police and show the correct respect to our great leaders.

 
Comment by Sam Brown
2008-02-05 12:49:29

You despicable sack of shit. Who the fuck are you to criticise Tony Blair or George Bush? You’re nothing compared to them. Nothing.

Why don’t you just bugger off back to your day job of defending rapists, paedophiles and murderers, you Saddam-loving, al Qa’eda supporting cretin.

If you love dictatorships so much why not head off to one and live there? See how much freedom of speech you enjoy there…

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 14:44:18

Sam!!! I love you! who are you? Please please post more. You are simply too adorable!

 
Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:48:25

I must say Sam, that while I truly love your post the logic escapes me. Nowhere do express support for dictators though if you can show me where I say that then I will yield the point.

I love freedom of speech & civil liberties as does your friend Shami Chakrabarti while you on the other hand, and from your blog, despise them. Surely it is you who should live in North Korea China where the civil liberties people you hate so much are hunted down.

I see from your blog you claim to be in Media & Communications. Since you don’t appear to be very good at communicating your points I take it you deliver newspapers in the morning?

As for defending rapists paedophiles, well, as any regular on the blog will tell you I don’t do criminal law. It simply pays too little and I’d wind up dealing with people who work in Media & Communications. Or ‘meeja’, as they usually pronounce it.

I do however believe that the vilest in society deserve representation and that it is the jury’s job to convict not mine. But that’s us civil liberties loonies with our ‘innocent until proven guilty’ crap. I’ll happily defend Bush against War crime charges, Blair for sleaze, or your mother for sucking cock for crack. It’s the right thing to do.

 
 
Comment by Mary
2008-02-05 12:52:30

I’m jealous. I’ve never had a stalker. How does it make you feel? All warm and gooey inside to know that there is such love for you? :mrgreen:

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:30:24

I’ve got two. It’s rather nice, one lives in Australia and so represents no real danger. In truth she is a rubbish stalker and rarely ever threatens me. Kids today, they just don’t try like we used to. I blame on the Internet.

Comment by Mary
2008-02-05 16:15:22

I blame it on the nanny-state. Too much hand-holding and coddling. The youth of today have no ability to think for themselves, depending on their mums to tell them what to say.

When I was young and nimble I use to make mudpies, to fling at neighbourhood children who annoyed me. Also ran a poker game as a child, gambling oreo cookies; naturally I cheated.

 
 
 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-05 13:28:21

and yet it must be admitted that of all his charges, i have yet to see al qaeda transliterated with a u in it. some things are important ffs.
must go and do my application for mini-pupillage at matrix chambers…except they don’t call things by names anyone would understand. it’s probably a mutually-fulfilling non-exploitative 21st century interpersonal self-development exercise. hell of a tab on the website…
oh you wanted a mini - why didn’t you say so?
i could work alongside ms booth on an incitement to murder chare against a barrister (or ‘daily mail-reading piece of filth’ as he should properly be called.)

 
Comment by the chief
2008-02-05 13:37:00

I think we’re all missing the really important point that BlairSupporter is making - “what’s happened to Lincoln’s Inn these days is beyond comprehenesion”. I heartily endorse this critical review, as only the other week I was passed over for port and when I had the temerity to ask, actually ask for some port, I was told that there was none left in the kitchen. Piffle, and I shall be moving to Gray’s just as soon as I can reasonably be bothered to do something about it, by which time I expect Geeklawyer to be emerging from prison, a better man for the Damascus realisation that Blair is never ever wrong.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 15:54:20

Lincoln’s running out of port?! That’s insane. I hardly wish to call you a liar but I feel you must have made an innocent mistake. Must have.

You didn’t go on a student night by mistake did you? I did a Domus night once some years back and made something of an arse of myself with the port, so it may have been for the best.

Thinking about it I really must do a Domus night again soon - they are such *fun*.

Comment by the chief
2008-02-05 17:06:24

Well the time before that it seemed to me that the other side of the table got plenty of wine, but my side, by which of course I mean me, appeared to be rationed. I suspect some dastardly plot to keep me sober orchestrated by either Blair or Easterman. But probably the latter.

Of course by “fun” we all know you mean “gawp at posh totty”, which a strict islamofascist such as yourself should really avoid :wink: .

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 17:18:53

Well yea I do like to look at the posh totty. I mean us terrorists like to have fun too. It’s not just about flying planes into buildings: sure we work hard but we party hard too.

If only I had the gift of pupillage I could get laid from one end of the month to the other.

(Comments wont nest below this level)
 
 
 
 
Comment by lawminx
2008-02-05 13:38:14

Oh Dear Mr Sam Brown,

Have you not heard the addage that he who resorts to name calling and insult is he who has no valid argument to proffer ? :roll:

 
Comment by Tony Blair
2008-02-05 13:39:06

Hi Geek

I totally agree with your fine blog post. Right, off to hang out with Boner from U2 and sign some consultancy contract with arms companies.

Tone

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 14:45:54

Cheers mate,
Can I advise on the contracts? - £300/hr to you - but don’t tell anyone else I’m undercharging.

 
 
Comment by Sam Brown
2008-02-05 16:05:37

Oooooooh, I’m really, really scared! What’re you gonna do? Send Osama round? Ha ha ha!

You and Shami Chakrabati are more than happy to stand up for the civil liberties and human rights of terrorists, perverts and dictators, but what about the rest of us?

What about the right not to be blown up on the tube by Islamist extremists? The rights of Iraqis to be able to vote for their leaders and not live in dictatorships, the like of which you support and Blair and Bush oppose? And how about the rights of Afghan women under your beloved Taleban?

You truly are the lowest of the low, you gutless little maggot.

Lawminx: Geeklawyer is not averse to flinging about personal insults. Have a go at him. Go on, I dare you…

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 16:32:31

“You and Shami Chakrabati are more than happy to stand up for the civil liberties and human rights of terrorists, perverts and dictators, but what about the rest of us?”

I’m afraid its even worse than you say. I am prepared to stand up for your rights too.

And the problem with people like you is you think ‘the others’ are bad and don’t deserve rights but when the government remove their rights they also remove yours.

And it is usually people like you who bleat - “why aren’t you cops out chasing criminals instead of abusing my rights” or “why are you Social Services/NHS/Taxmen/etc abusing your powers? I’m a taxpayer I have human rights whine whine”. I just *know* you are one of those.

I understand your position: bigotry intolerance and unfairness are the easy options for you IQ-Lite members of society. But they are also the most ineffective. Similarly your “right not to be blown up” is, likewise, a vacuous dichotomy (Google the terms I realise you won’t understand). If you don’t want to be blown up don’t engage in phoney wars as an excuse for geopolitical machinations.

Yes I know this is all above your head paperboy - go and read the Sun. And ask someone what all the words in it mean. But thanks for trying to play - even if it is like shooting narcoleptic fish in a barrel.

Since your vocabulary, as well as your logic, seems a little empty try http://www.las-vegas-nevada.ws/Curse-Words.php for some more imaginative insults than ‘maggot’. Hav you thought of poltroon? I always like that one.

 
 
Comment by simply wondered
2008-02-05 16:22:39

sam has the irony thing covered in a big way. even i can’t do that. he’s going to get my mini-pupillage, damn him. and i’ll have to go and be a solicitor. my life is over.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 18:48:45

Don’t fear - it’s never too late to stab rivals in the back.

 
 
Comment by Tony Blair
2008-02-05 16:26:21

Dear Geek

I’m truly sorry about my wayward loony bin supporters Sam Brown and BlairSupporter (who has a picture of me tattooed somewhere only Cherie has seen - very naughty boy!)

I will get Gordon to send in the incompetent police to kill them off, mistaking them for terrorists.

£300 / hour for contracts? That’s less than I paid the lawyers when buying my homes all round the world near the end of my time as PM!

Yours

Tone

 
Comment by lawminx
2008-02-05 16:27:57

Er…. No. I’m not into mudslinging.

 
Comment by theladyrobinson
2008-02-05 16:59:55

Sam: Sweetie, calm down. Now, go and read some history. Find out who funded the Taliban (not Taleban). It was America. Keep reading. Find out why no foreign army has succeeded on Afghan soil for 1000 years. Then ask yourself what those poor army boys are doing there. They’re not saving us Sam. Mostly they’re trying to save themselves.

And yes Iraq is going terribly well, isn’t it? Before your man invaded, they went to the market in Baghdad and bought oranges. Now, they go and get blown up. Unlike you, international relations is very complex and Iraq is a very old place where different muslim factions have been itching to claim superiority. We gave them that chance. So now the good people of Iraq are worse off than they’ve ever been.

As for Osama, well he’s a red herring. Living it up in Waziristan on American money. As I said Sam, you need to do some heavy reading. So run along.

See Sam, sometimes it’s hard to say what is right and what is wrong. Because it’s all wrong. Like you.

 
Comment by moon23
2008-02-05 18:31:33

GL,

I like the addition of the Loan add, is this to cash in on the thick plebs that seem to be invading your site. LOL

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 18:49:48

I have no control over the ads - the Great Lord Google does those.

 
 
Comment by Charon QC
2008-02-05 18:55:43

GL… I hope you have disclosed the income from the loan ads to whoever you disclose things to….

Wouldn’t want you to be suspended from Parliament…

I am going to watch TV…. cream krackered again…

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 19:30:30

I report all my income. Though I wonder if Bliar has reported any of the bribes he must have received.

I may go to the pub. It’s been huge fun here so far, thanks to “Rain-Man” AKA BlairSupporter and Simple Sam.

 
 
Comment by Sam Brown
2008-02-05 19:13:00

Geeklawyer, you condescending little fuck, why not put your manifesto to the public, and see how many people support your cowardly, surrender-monkey view of life, you shit.

You won’t because you don’t believe in democracy and wouldn’t have a hope in hell of winning.

Tony Blair - democratically elected.
George Bush - democratically elected.
Nouri al-Maliki - democratically elected.
Hamid Karzai - democratically elected.
Ehud Olmert - democratically elected.
Saddam Hussein, Mullah Omar, Abu Hamza, Shami Chakrabarti and yourself - not a single vote between you.

Bugger off and start showing some respect you goat-fucker.

The trouble with scum like you is you can’t differentiate right from wrong: If the cheque’s large enough you’ll defend someone, no matter how guilty they are. You’d even have defended Hitler given half the chance.

Tut tut tut.

Comment by Usefully Employed
2008-02-05 19:36:09

Adolf Hitler - democratically elected.

Oops sorry I meant, Adolf Hitler, democratically elected, fuck shit wank bugger.

 
Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 19:43:16

Remind me of your democratic credentials Simple Sam?

The main problem with democracy is that it is oiks like you that get to vote. So even if I had a manifesto it would be a prat like you it had to be presented to. I suppose I could put pictures of naked women to hold your interest: “Sexy Sam says proportional representation is good, vote for Geeklawyer”. I think that there should be either a property or a minimal education requirement to have the vote and that should prevent mouth breathers like you defiling the process.

I would have defended Hitler regardless of the cheque. It is a matter of honour to my profession and a mark of my professionalism and my commitment to a fair trial in a democratic and just society.

These are things you are too dim to understand and in fact I did recently try to explain them to you. Apparently the absence of verbal punctuation “you know” “like” “innit” “whatever” and “fuck” has rendered it unintelligible to a chav like you.

It’s great to have your mindless abuse and simian intellect on the blog. I hope you will utter your monosyllabic grunts in other posts too. Until now all my readers have been well educated intelligent witty articulate professionals. With you and BlairSupporter on board it means that when we mock working class scum we have a worthy target for our derision and contempt.

I assume you will be off to bed soon, getting up at 5am to do your meeja paper round must be taxing. Do you ever feel you may get a job stacking shelves in Sainsbury’s one day? I reckon with a bit of effort and some evening classes in 5 or 10 years time you might just manage it. Just think - you might earn 8 perhaps 9 pounds an hour!!! Think how much White Lightning cider you can buy with that kind of money, sorry dosh, Geezer.

Really, please use the swear word generator - click the pointy web linky thingy, it’s easy - go on try.

 
Comment by moon23
2008-02-06 09:56:40

Democracy comes from the Greek demos (people) and kratien meaning “to rule. It is ‘power to the people’ in other words. I don’t see how anyone who calls themselves democratic could honestly hold Tony Blair (35% vote) and George Bush (Oh look I won on a legal ruling) up as champions of democracy. I mean come on with an archaic first past the post system in which your democratic influence comes down to voting between two idiots who are both fighting over the middle ground as portrayed in the corporate press.

When your MP gets in your influence is then reduced to writing them letters, which if you are lucky they will pay a member of their family to respond with some token lip service. Meanwhile they swan off from press one press opportunity to the next whilst a mixture of unelected corporations, quangoes and civil servants actual run the country.

The only time these dimwitted media obsessed egotist mention democracy is when they are busy deluding themselves with grandiose visions of being god’s conduit on earth (something that Tom Cruise does more convincingly). The battle for democracy seems to involve selectively cherry picking countries with significant resources and strategic geo-political importance to invade, whilst happily allowing other tyrants to go pretty much unchecked so long as they are compliant with their economic aims.

So long as inbred morons like you (Sam) are in the majority, (something that I fear will always be the case with the current education system, and abundance of cultural industries who are prepared to feed you dross dependant brain to make a quick buck.) we will never have a healthy democracy. Instead we will be doomed to gaze at the stars and dream of a better tomorrow whilst you fight it out on deck with your petty sound bites you have absorbed via moronic osmosis from the nearest redtop/friend down the pub.

 
 
Comment by lawminx
2008-02-05 19:30:37

Mr Brown,

I am absolutely :shock: at the outrageous tone inherent in your posts.There are ladies present, you know. Really, if you dont have anything nice to say, then dont say anything at all. :roll:

 
Comment by james c
2008-02-05 20:06:20

My Dear Geek,

What has happened to your blog? Why are you trading insults with your inferiors?

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-05 20:14:17

It’s fun!!! It’s like kick a chav day. Honestly, tell me you wouldn’t enjoy tweaking the tail of Simple Sam? Try it, it’s terrific, like a sort of bloodsport where nothing of any significance is hurt.

Go on, try. I’ll get you started. Simple Sam: James c finds you even more risible than I do.

 
 
Comment by freddy
2008-02-06 06:57:00

Backing up a bit beyond the bare-knuckle fighting…

you said that Bliar, “wants to bugger up the EU too by becoming PM of the EU”. I’ll ignore the touch of repetition there because it’s important to highlight an issue.

How can anyone ‘bugger up the EU’? It’s already fucked beyond recognition. Shagged. Bolloxed. Corrupt beyond any comprehendable standard. Inefficient. Flawed as a model. Perfect for Bliar and his cronies, but if ever there were a worthwhile target for osama and his boys then the EU buildings are it

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-06 08:06:12

THe core problem with the EU is that it is civil service led & without adequate democratic input. That’s inherent given its origins as a Coal and Steel agreement that grew like topsy. I don’t think it is irredeemably screwed up but trying to reform it is like trying to turn an oil tanker.

A fuckwit like Bliar isn’t the man for the job - by his nature he is a man with no vision but a need to lead, and who knows the value of pretending he has a vision.

 
 
Comment by freddy
2008-02-06 09:34:22

How can any organisation that attempts to combine the interests of an ever-growing number of member states all acting in a variety of coalitions endeavouring to arrive at compromise solutions to complex problems ever be functional? I could debate this with you for hours, and would be happy to do so, but, for me, the oil-tanker is holed below the waterline, better to let it sink than to attempt to redirect it’s course.

 
Comment by james c
2008-02-06 12:17:30

My Dear Geek,

How kind of you to insult Simple Sam on my behalf.

When you have finished your campaign against the invaders, could you resume normal service? By which I mean ranting, drinking, fornicating and illustrating your blog with some nice pictures.

Comment by Geeklawyer
2008-02-06 20:49:17

Unfortunately it seems Simple Sam and BliarSupporter seem to have vanished, which is very annoying.

But yes normal, and I use the word advisedly, service will resume shortly.