<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientology and DDos attacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#038; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19260</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 10:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19260</guid>
		<description>'Your Honour the victim of the assault was Tom Cruise':

i thought it already was a section 3 defence under the criminal law act 1967 - i mean he's bound to do something wrong sooner or later. And isn't there a proposed reform to do with keeping small annoying people off the streets?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Your Honour the victim of the assault was Tom Cruise&#8217;:</p>
<p>i thought it already was a section 3 defence under the criminal law act 1967 - i mean he&#8217;s bound to do something wrong sooner or later. And isn&#8217;t there a proposed reform to do with keeping small annoying people off the streets?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19254</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 18:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19254</guid>
		<description>My incompetence at criminal law is the subject of much mirth &#038; nipple tweaking by Ruthie, but I wasn't sure that religious 'hate attacks' were a specific crime (racial &#038; sexuality attacks,  yes). If that is right then it wouldn't attract an extra penal element: you'd just be done for assault. To which there is perfect mitigation. to whit:

&lt;i&gt;"Geeklawyer: Your Honour the victim of the assault was Tom Cruise."&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;

&lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;"Judge (without listening to further submissions): Mr Cruise you are hereby sentenced to 5 years of hard labour. I'll work out the charge later; and you must pay the accused £50k in damages"&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My incompetence at criminal law is the subject of much mirth &#038; nipple tweaking by Ruthie, but I wasn&#8217;t sure that religious &#8216;hate attacks&#8217; were a specific crime (racial &#038; sexuality attacks,  yes). If that is right then it wouldn&#8217;t attract an extra penal element: you&#8217;d just be done for assault. To which there is perfect mitigation. to whit:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;Geeklawyer: Your Honour the victim of the assault was Tom Cruise.&#8221;</i><i></p>
<p></i><i>&#8220;Judge (without listening to further submissions): Mr Cruise you are hereby sentenced to 5 years of hard labour. I&#8217;ll work out the charge later; and you must pay the accused £50k in damages&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fink Floyd</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19253</link>
		<dc:creator>Fink Floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 16:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19253</guid>
		<description>Good post, and I agree entirely.  It's a scary, scary cult which needs to be declared such by as many people as possible.  

Could beating up a Scientologist (let's face it, Tiny Tom is *properly* asking for it) be described as religiously motivated?  Scientology isn't really a religion, so despite its being the catalyst for the attack, would it be a religiously motivated thing, or could the person in question just say they gave him a beating because he's a prick?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post, and I agree entirely.  It&#8217;s a scary, scary cult which needs to be declared such by as many people as possible.  </p>
<p>Could beating up a Scientologist (let&#8217;s face it, Tiny Tom is *properly* asking for it) be described as religiously motivated?  Scientology isn&#8217;t really a religion, so despite its being the catalyst for the attack, would it be a religiously motivated thing, or could the person in question just say they gave him a beating because he&#8217;s a prick?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawminx</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19230</link>
		<dc:creator>lawminx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2008/01/25/scientology-and-ddos-attacks/#comment-19230</guid>
		<description>Somehow, "loony" doesn't even begin to describe a " religion" which claims  that humanity is descended from your bog standard local mollusc, and is chock full of 'Engrams'(illnesses?)left by the souls of deceased ailens which live in volcanos and were blown up by some other ailen or something.... (* looses plot at this point and takes to drink*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, &#8220;loony&#8221; doesn&#8217;t even begin to describe a &#8221; religion&#8221; which claims  that humanity is descended from your bog standard local mollusc, and is chock full of &#8216;Engrams&#8217;(illnesses?)left by the souls of deceased ailens which live in volcanos and were blown up by some other ailen or something&#8230;. (* looses plot at this point and takes to drink*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
