<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geeklawyer naked in front of a judge - again.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blimey - the judge has me on speed dial?</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-19206</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blimey - the judge has me on speed dial?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-19206</guid>
		<description>[...] may remember Geeklawyer&#8217;s post about being phoned up by the judge. Well, bugger me if it didn&#8217;t happen again. This time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] may remember Geeklawyer&#8217;s post about being phoned up by the judge. Well, bugger me if it didn&#8217;t happen again. This time [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18854</link>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 22:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18854</guid>
		<description>Good evening Geeklawyer,

It has been a difficult day. I had hoped to go out for a Christmas lunch and take advantage of the temporary A&#38;E tent facilities for drunken city workers provided by our hard pressed NHS. It was not to be.

I got a call from the Home Secretary to ask if I could provide 'door security' because they had discovered an illegal (SIA cleared) working as a doorman at the Home Office. I asked if the wage was above the 'national minimum wage". It was. I asked if I could add a supplement of 500 quid an hour to reflect current non legal aid City rates - a figure I read about in The Sun this morning being charged by a law firm for divorce matters. This did not pose a problem.

I got my old red rope unit on a stand out. Changed into black trousers, black tea shirt, black Crombie coat, black shoes and sunglasses - and did my bit for the security of non-Schengen Britain. Had a bit of fun telling Geoff Hoon he couldn't come in and Charles Clarke accepted my judgement on his 'dress code' and went off to another establishment to celebrate the last Friday before Christmas.

It was a bit more difficult explaining to that Shadowy David Davies chap, who looks as if he spends far too much time at Nicky Clarke's hairdressing salon in Mayfair, that he could not come in because he turned up wearing his old SAS kit... and, because of the gasmask, I didn't recognise him at first. I let him in... because he promised to change his combat boots for trainers and showed me his plans for the future of a New Britain, maps showing lots of new prison locations, prison ships moored on the South Coast,  and an order form to our new friends in China for fantastic quantities of barbed wire to protect our borders against all these new Schengens who are driving all over Europe, as I write, in VW camper vans. 

You must appreciate, of course, that I only do this sort of thing at Christmas - I like to help 'The Hopeless". 

Tomorrow morning I am going to be interviewed on GMTV. I haven't been invited - but, hey... will they know that I am not Labour government minister for Christmas?... after all, it was not that long ago that the BBC interviwed a mini-cab driver from North Africa believing him to be an expert on intellectual property law. I am pretty sure you weren't the real IP lawyer on that occasion.

I hope you are having a Liam Donaldson (Chief Government Quack) approved evening.... a piu tarde...

I shall archive this, as with all my letters to you, in my 'letters' section.

I hope you are conscious for Christmas...

Charon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good evening Geeklawyer,</p>
<p>It has been a difficult day. I had hoped to go out for a Christmas lunch and take advantage of the temporary A&amp;E tent facilities for drunken city workers provided by our hard pressed NHS. It was not to be.</p>
<p>I got a call from the Home Secretary to ask if I could provide &#8216;door security&#8217; because they had discovered an illegal (SIA cleared) working as a doorman at the Home Office. I asked if the wage was above the &#8216;national minimum wage&#8221;. It was. I asked if I could add a supplement of 500 quid an hour to reflect current non legal aid City rates - a figure I read about in The Sun this morning being charged by a law firm for divorce matters. This did not pose a problem.</p>
<p>I got my old red rope unit on a stand out. Changed into black trousers, black tea shirt, black Crombie coat, black shoes and sunglasses - and did my bit for the security of non-Schengen Britain. Had a bit of fun telling Geoff Hoon he couldn&#8217;t come in and Charles Clarke accepted my judgement on his &#8216;dress code&#8217; and went off to another establishment to celebrate the last Friday before Christmas.</p>
<p>It was a bit more difficult explaining to that Shadowy David Davies chap, who looks as if he spends far too much time at Nicky Clarke&#8217;s hairdressing salon in Mayfair, that he could not come in because he turned up wearing his old SAS kit&#8230; and, because of the gasmask, I didn&#8217;t recognise him at first. I let him in&#8230; because he promised to change his combat boots for trainers and showed me his plans for the future of a New Britain, maps showing lots of new prison locations, prison ships moored on the South Coast,  and an order form to our new friends in China for fantastic quantities of barbed wire to protect our borders against all these new Schengens who are driving all over Europe, as I write, in VW camper vans. </p>
<p>You must appreciate, of course, that I only do this sort of thing at Christmas - I like to help &#8216;The Hopeless&#8221;. </p>
<p>Tomorrow morning I am going to be interviewed on GMTV. I haven&#8217;t been invited - but, hey&#8230; will they know that I am not Labour government minister for Christmas?&#8230; after all, it was not that long ago that the BBC interviwed a mini-cab driver from North Africa believing him to be an expert on intellectual property law. I am pretty sure you weren&#8217;t the real IP lawyer on that occasion.</p>
<p>I hope you are having a Liam Donaldson (Chief Government Quack) approved evening&#8230;. a piu tarde&#8230;</p>
<p>I shall archive this, as with all my letters to you, in my &#8216;letters&#8217; section.</p>
<p>I hope you are conscious for Christmas&#8230;</p>
<p>Charon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saturday Review: Christmas 2007 Edition Part I&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18853</link>
		<dc:creator>Saturday Review: Christmas 2007 Edition Part I&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 19:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18853</guid>
		<description>[...] Geeklawyer gets a call from a High Court judge while he is taking a bath. Ruthie sympathises with those who are turned down for Silk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Geeklawyer gets a call from a High Court judge while he is taking a bath. Ruthie sympathises with those who are turned down for Silk. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18850</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 10:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18850</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure It'll pan out like that either - but it would certainly be a realistic future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure It&#8217;ll pan out like that either - but it would certainly be a realistic future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A personal statement&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18849</link>
		<dc:creator>A personal statement&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18849</guid>
		<description>[...] and finally&#8230; since it has a bit of law in it.  Geeklawyer gets a phonecall from a High Court judge while he is in the bath.  He puts his wig on to take the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and finally&#8230; since it has a bit of law in it.  Geeklawyer gets a phonecall from a High Court judge while he is in the bath.  He puts his wig on to take the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18847</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 00:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/12/21/geeklawyer-naked-in-front-of-a-judge-again/#comment-18847</guid>
		<description>I agreed you had an interesting argument. Which is very different to saying you are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agreed you had an interesting argument. Which is very different to saying you are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
