<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Filthy lucre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Legal blog sponsorships begin to blossom overseas - FP Legal Post</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18625</link>
		<dc:creator>Legal blog sponsorships begin to blossom overseas - FP Legal Post</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18625</guid>
		<description>[...] of a pupil barrister undergoing the trials of pupillage at the English Bar.&#39; Not to be outdone, Geek Lawyer has also made a somewhat playful “play” at the sponsorship market. As for myself, I can now [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of a pupil barrister undergoing the trials of pupillage at the English Bar.&#39; Not to be outdone, Geek Lawyer has also made a somewhat playful “play” at the sponsorship market. As for myself, I can now [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Law Firm Web Strategy : Law Blog Sponsorships? Clifford Chance's Move Could be a Trend</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18329</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Firm Web Strategy : Law Blog Sponsorships? Clifford Chance's Move Could be a Trend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18329</guid>
		<description>[...] An interesting development out of the UK. Clifford Chance has made a very targeted move in sponsoring Conflict of Laws.net. More on the sponsorship here, and here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] An interesting development out of the UK. Clifford Chance has made a very targeted move in sponsoring Conflict of Laws.net. More on the sponsorship here, and here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18174</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18174</guid>
		<description>Well and good if one is a QC rolling in money - the rest of live from fee note to fee note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well and good if one is a QC rolling in money - the rest of live from fee note to fee note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VM</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18173</link>
		<dc:creator>VM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18173</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Ruthieslaw&lt;/i&gt; officially &lt;i&gt;despises&lt;/i&gt; commercial sponsorship. It is simply &lt;i&gt;so&lt;/i&gt; non-U.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Ruthieslaw</i> officially <i>despises</i> commercial sponsorship. It is simply <i>so</i> non-U.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18159</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18159</guid>
		<description>I've always had deep admiration for CC's wealth and willingness to give it to worthy lawyers ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always had deep admiration for CC&#8217;s wealth and willingness to give it to worthy lawyers <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18158</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:48:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18158</guid>
		<description>of course not GL ..., surely the other way around :!:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of course not GL &#8230;, surely the other way around <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_exclaim.gif' alt=':!:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18157</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18157</guid>
		<description>Heavens, it's not as if Clifford Chance would be embarrassed to be associated with me is it?  :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heavens, it&#8217;s not as if Clifford Chance would be embarrassed to be associated with me is it?  <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18156</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18156</guid>
		<description>Whilst I do still think we should be blogging ourselves, I'm pleased to see my lot actually getting involved in blogging, even in a sponsorship way. A good site to choose too (sorry GL!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst I do still think we should be blogging ourselves, I&#8217;m pleased to see my lot actually getting involved in blogging, even in a sponsorship way. A good site to choose too (sorry GL!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fanboy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18155</link>
		<dc:creator>Fanboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18155</guid>
		<description>Well, if Clifford &#38; Chance can't write their own blog, why not pay someone else to?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, if Clifford &amp; Chance can&#8217;t write their own blog, why not pay someone else to?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18154</link>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 06:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/30/filthy-lucre/#comment-18154</guid>
		<description>Excellent Martin... well done.. 

GL.... you'll just have to raise your game :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Martin&#8230; well done.. </p>
<p>GL&#8230;. you&#8217;ll just have to raise your game <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
