Comments on: Blawg Review http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:55:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17924 Ruthie Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:43:44 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17924 hmm, partially true but whilst I do despise weakness in men, I do also expect to be worshipped and adored, so its a complicated formula. Perhaps the reason I'm not married is that no-one has yet been able to work the formula out! For the record, don't be fooled by the dresses, VM is one of the hardest people I know. hmm, partially true but whilst I do despise weakness in men, I do also expect to be worshipped and adored, so its a complicated formula.

Perhaps the reason I’m not married is that no-one has yet been able to work the formula out!

For the record, don’t be fooled by the dresses, VM is one of the hardest people I know.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17917 Geeklawyer Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:50:34 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17917 fairest VM, As a longtime Ruthie <i>handler</i> let me offer some advice on her management. She despises weakness in men. She pretends she likes it and enjoys dominating; but, schizophrenically, secretly she regards compliant men as un-masculine and beneath contempt. She must treated with brutality cruelty and given arbitrary contradictory dictats. This works, although the ride is rough and a good saddle and whip are needed. The key to understanding mastering and controlling a Ruthie is to understand her relationship with her father - but be aware that none of the usual cliches apply to such an analysis: on a public blog I can say no more. A PhD thesis is currently being worked on. As for your own offering I'm sure Tucker's erection will satisfy if it is sufficiently large and firm whether or not I am included. fairest VM,
As a longtime Ruthie handler let me offer some advice on her management. She despises weakness in men. She pretends she likes it and enjoys dominating; but, schizophrenically, secretly she regards compliant men as un-masculine and beneath contempt. She must treated with brutality cruelty and given arbitrary contradictory dictats. This works, although the ride is rough and a good saddle and whip are needed.

The key to understanding mastering and controlling a Ruthie is to understand her relationship with her father - but be aware that none of the usual cliches apply to such an analysis: on a public blog I can say no more. A PhD thesis is currently being worked on.

As for your own offering I’m sure Tucker’s erection will satisfy if it is sufficiently large and firm whether or not I am included.

]]> By: VM http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17916 VM Sat, 06 Oct 2007 19:31:57 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17916 Dear Mr Greeklawyer, I <i>do</i> hope that offering you <i>free</i> drinks will <i>not</i> suffice to ensure inclusion. Speaking personally, I intend to beg <i>Mistress Ruthie</i> to select her <i>favourites</i> and then to allow Tucker to stand <i>erect</i> and dictate my few choices. I am <i>afraid</i> that the likelihood is thus that Ruthie's Law will be unable to scratch your <i>back</i> (although Tucker is prepared to offer an <i>alternative</i>). I apologise in <i>advance</i> should that prove to be <i>so</i>. I do not <i>believe</i> that Mr Hull has <i>multiple personality disorder</i>. It would only <i>confuse</i> poor Emu. Dear Mr Greeklawyer,

I do hope that offering you free drinks will not suffice to ensure inclusion. Speaking personally, I intend to beg Mistress Ruthie to select her favourites and then to allow Tucker to stand erect and dictate my few choices. I am afraid that the likelihood is thus that Ruthie’s Law will be unable to scratch your back (although Tucker is prepared to offer an alternative). I apologise in advance should that prove to be so.

I do not believe that Mr Hull has multiple personality disorder. It would only confuse poor Emu.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17913 Geeklawyer Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:42:11 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17913 Dearest Ruthie, you were invited, and as usual yielded easily, in order to goad the greater goal: me. I shall look forward to your, and VM's, effort knowing that it will be entirely adequate; I shall, however, shine. I agree: while Hull and the Blawg Review editor may not be one and the same (though I suspect as much) I can find no Holden Oliver in the Washington Bar Directory or several other directories I tried (I'm not sure if there is a central register of US lawyers - like our own Solicitors Roll or the Bar Directory). Holden Oliver is either fictional or dubious - though a phone call to Hull McQuire may solve it if he is not a phoney Bahamanian employee (for tax purposes). Dearest Ruthie, you were invited, and as usual yielded easily, in order to goad the greater goal: me. I shall look forward to your, and VM’s, effort knowing that it will be entirely adequate; I shall, however, shine.

I agree: while Hull and the Blawg Review editor may not be one and the same (though I suspect as much) I can find no Holden Oliver in the Washington Bar Directory or several other directories I tried (I’m not sure if there is a central register of US lawyers - like our own Solicitors Roll or the Bar Directory). Holden Oliver is either fictional or dubious - though a phone call to Hull McQuire may solve it if he is not a phoney Bahamanian employee (for tax purposes).

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17911 Ruthie Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:26:44 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17911 I'd like to point out that I was asked before you. But I am also deeply suspicious that both Ed and Holden are Dan Hull, despite his vehement denials. The dresses that I left in America should be now have reached Dan's office, but I have heard nothing. Could it be that Dan has taken them to bed with him, or has worn them out? I’d like to point out that I was asked before you. But I am also deeply suspicious that both Ed and Holden are Dan Hull, despite his vehement denials.

The dresses that I left in America should be now have reached Dan’s office, but I have heard nothing. Could it be that Dan has taken them to bed with him, or has worn them out?

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17909 Geeklawyer Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:09:17 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17909 I didn't pull an all-nighter I was merely inept. I watched the rugby 10-12 and cheered heartily: close but satisfying. I didn’t pull an all-nighter I was merely inept. I watched the rugby 10-12 and cheered heartily: close but satisfying.

]]> By: Charon QC http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17908 Charon QC Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:04:55 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17908 GL... I note the time of your last response to comments - 7.32. From this..and the unusual spelling of Churchill - am I to take it that you pulled an all nighter? Bravo... and, today, England defeated the Australians again at Rugby. I seem to recall the Australian coach saying that they would win by 30 points. Not today...cobber. GL… I note the time of your last response to comments - 7.32. From this..and the unusual spelling of Churchill - am I to take it that you pulled an all nighter?

Bravo… and, today, England defeated the Australians again at Rugby. I seem to recall the Australian coach saying that they would win by 30 points. Not today…cobber.

]]> By: Be afraid… « Charon QC…the blawg http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17902 Be afraid… « Charon QC…the blawg Sat, 06 Oct 2007 10:59:47 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17902 [...] We have the meme/tagging of blawgers by the mysterious Editor of The Blawg review.  We have Geeklawyer, mildly over-refreshed informing us of his latest hypothesis that the mysterious Editor of The [...] […] We have the meme/tagging of blawgers by the mysterious Editor of The Blawg review.  We have Geeklawyer, mildly over-refreshed informing us of his latest hypothesis that the mysterious Editor of The […]

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17898 Geeklawyer Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:32:03 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17898 I'm very much looking forward to it Charon. You do it in the style of Churchill and I will do it in the style of Dubya. I’m very much looking forward to it Charon. You do it in the style of Churchill and I will do it in the style of Dubya.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17897 Geeklawyer Sat, 06 Oct 2007 07:26:56 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/10/05/blawg-review/#comment-17897 Dammit Dan you're a hard man. Must my drafting remain perfect even when hammered? Do you think me one of your associates? Dammit Dan you’re a hard man. Must my drafting remain perfect even when hammered? Do you think me one of your associates?

]]>