Comments on: Lords rush in where fools fear to tread? http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:00:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16121 Geeklawyer Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:23:40 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16121 I don't have time to do any more research, and in any event I know who reads your blog so I'd be *way* too intimidated to guest blog :???: I don’t have time to do any more research, and in any event I know who reads your blog so I’d be *way* too intimidated to guest blog :???:

]]> By: Martin http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16086 Martin Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:56:23 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16086 The HL Report, by the way, can be found <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200607/ldselect/ldsctech/165/16502.htm" rel="nofollow">here</a>. The HL Report, by the way, can be found here.

]]> By: Martin http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16085 Martin Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:54:03 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16085 It's certainly an interesting, and difficult, question. Oddly, I posted a link to an article on a closely-related point earlier today: <a href="http://www.conflictoflaws.net/2007/jurisdiction/usa/american-and-european-approaches-to-personal-jurisdiction-based-upon-internet-activity/" rel="nofollow">here</a> Fancy doing some research and writing a guest post on conflictoflaws.net? It’s certainly an interesting, and difficult, question. Oddly, I posted a link to an article on a closely-related point earlier today: here

Fancy doing some research and writing a guest post on conflictoflaws.net?

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16084 Geeklawyer Fri, 10 Aug 2007 22:46:59 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16084 Can't find the original report - just the reports of the report. Jurisdiction: I think we're saying the same thing? Would the Chinese court accept the submission that a UK court could properly entertain an action relating to conduct on Chinese territory; and if that condition precedent is accepted, is any subsequent UK judgment enforceable. Can’t find the original report - just the reports of the report.

Jurisdiction: I think we’re saying the same thing? Would the Chinese court accept the submission that a UK court could properly entertain an action relating to conduct on Chinese territory; and if that condition precedent is accepted, is any subsequent UK judgment enforceable.

]]> By: Martin http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16083 Martin Fri, 10 Aug 2007 21:53:04 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/08/10/lords-rush-in-where-fools-fear-to-tread/#comment-16083 On your point on China and the US being unlikely to accept UK jurisdiction, the real question would presumably be whether a judgment obtained in England could be recognised and enforced in those countries. Where's the link to the HL report, by the way? :roll: On your point on China and the US being unlikely to accept UK jurisdiction, the real question would presumably be whether a judgment obtained in England could be recognised and enforced in those countries.

Where’s the link to the HL report, by the way? :roll:

]]>