<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In a cunting bad mood (parental advisory/post not safe for fucking work)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 09:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: simply wondered</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18445</link>
		<dc:creator>simply wondered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18445</guid>
		<description>hmm - i detect a touch of miffed-ness in your post. i wondered also whether you were using the word aphoretic in a philosophical or medical sense. thanks for a new word!
political correctness is a word you should look up - i think it might amuse you as a concept.

really, though, i do think we of the middle classes should shut our overpaid mouths and, if we are really so incensed by something, change it or put up with it. and that doesn't mean assuming our alleged representatives will do it for us. quit the job and set up an organisation dedicated to achieving our end. 
no? still clinging desperately to our salary (yes; not technically correct for a barrister)? then we are reduced to impotent adjective-heavy rants. nothing wrong with that, we all have to eat and i love a rant (both giving and receiving). but it's like going to your partner with problems and them coming back with solutions when what you wanted was sympathy.

also good to learn that it's only solicitors who are scum - had never realised at least part of the profession are divine creatures of light dedicated to the eradication of nastiness and the preservatiion of small fluffy kittens. good job it's the bit i'm going to join - phew!

still - a delightful rant and (if other lawyers are to be believed) on a real and important problem. hope you are feeling better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm - i detect a touch of miffed-ness in your post. i wondered also whether you were using the word aphoretic in a philosophical or medical sense. thanks for a new word!<br />
political correctness is a word you should look up - i think it might amuse you as a concept.</p>
<p>really, though, i do think we of the middle classes should shut our overpaid mouths and, if we are really so incensed by something, change it or put up with it. and that doesn&#8217;t mean assuming our alleged representatives will do it for us. quit the job and set up an organisation dedicated to achieving our end.<br />
no? still clinging desperately to our salary (yes; not technically correct for a barrister)? then we are reduced to impotent adjective-heavy rants. nothing wrong with that, we all have to eat and i love a rant (both giving and receiving). but it&#8217;s like going to your partner with problems and them coming back with solutions when what you wanted was sympathy.</p>
<p>also good to learn that it&#8217;s only solicitors who are scum - had never realised at least part of the profession are divine creatures of light dedicated to the eradication of nastiness and the preservatiion of small fluffy kittens. good job it&#8217;s the bit i&#8217;m going to join - phew!</p>
<p>still - a delightful rant and (if other lawyers are to be believed) on a real and important problem. hope you are feeling better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18439</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18439</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;fused&lt;/i&gt; profession? Well that's fine and all, but wont it risk me being confused with a solicitor? Or worse still a solicitor-inadequate like Ruthie?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>fused</i> profession? Well that&#8217;s fine and all, but wont it risk me being confused with a solicitor? Or worse still a solicitor-inadequate like Ruthie?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18438</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-18438</guid>
		<description>Come on GL - you're going to have to get off the fence one of these days and start speaking your mind.  Anyway with current trends we'll have the much vaunted American style fused profession soon, and that's got to be a good thing yes?


 chortle like Mutley
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on GL - you&#8217;re going to have to get off the fence one of these days and start speaking your mind.  Anyway with current trends we&#8217;ll have the much vaunted American style fused profession soon, and that&#8217;s got to be a good thing yes?</p>
<p> chortle like Mutley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15705</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15705</guid>
		<description>This is developing into a theme amongst professionals: accountants and auditors have linked to this post (as can be seen in the above comment trackbacks) and said it is the same for them!

We are revolting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is developing into a theme amongst professionals: accountants and auditors have linked to this post (as can be seen in the above comment trackbacks) and said it is the same for them!</p>
<p>We are revolting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thanatos</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15703</link>
		<dc:creator>Thanatos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 06:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15703</guid>
		<description>Just what medics feels about the spineless syncophants who purport to represent the interests of the medical profession in the BMA, GMC &#38; Medical Royal Colleges.  :evil:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what medics feels about the spineless syncophants who purport to represent the interests of the medical profession in the BMA, GMC &amp; Medical Royal Colleges.  <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_evil.gif' alt=':evil:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lawgirl</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15580</link>
		<dc:creator>lawgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2007 16:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15580</guid>
		<description>I do love a good rant!!! Even if I am not included in the upper echelons of the intelligista by geeklawyer's parameters. I am somehwhere around the middle to upper. Instant disqualification from the bar! Oh well, a pint of beer on my amex might sort you out?! :grin:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do love a good rant!!! Even if I am not included in the upper echelons of the intelligista by geeklawyer&#8217;s parameters. I am somehwhere around the middle to upper. Instant disqualification from the bar! Oh well, a pint of beer on my amex might sort you out?! <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':grin:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15524</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15524</guid>
		<description>What!? explain - advance rational excuses? Heavens, where to begin. I'll think about it in the pub and revert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What!? explain - advance rational excuses? Heavens, where to begin. I&#8217;ll think about it in the pub and revert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Lauded Mr Pineapples</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15523</link>
		<dc:creator>The Lauded Mr Pineapples</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 12:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15523</guid>
		<description>loved your post Geeky...but I am not sure what it is you are so angry with? :razz: 

Could you explain what it is that has indeed anoyed you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>loved your post Geeky&#8230;but I am not sure what it is you are so angry with? <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':razz:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Could you explain what it is that has indeed anoyed you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: When IT audits go very wrong: the story of Boeing and SoX - A Counting School</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15472</link>
		<dc:creator>When IT audits go very wrong: the story of Boeing and SoX - A Counting School</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15472</guid>
		<description>[...] of money blown testing controls that had no chance of passing brings to mind a recent post by GeekLawyer bashing his profession, criticizing poor lawyers for spoiling their profession&#39;s repu....A lot of the highlighted points in Francine&#39;s article either look outlandishly grim or [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] of money blown testing controls that had no chance of passing brings to mind a recent post by GeekLawyer bashing his profession, criticizing poor lawyers for spoiling their profession&#39;s repu&#8230;.A lot of the highlighted points in Francine&#39;s article either look outlandishly grim or [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We&#8217;re not alone &#171; AccMan</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15464</link>
		<dc:creator>We&#8217;re not alone &#171; AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/07/16/in-a-cunting-bad-mood-parental-advisorypost-not-safe-for-fucking-work/#comment-15464</guid>
		<description>[...] This from Geeklawyer (absolutely not for the faint hearted or easily offended): Our profession is being dismantled slowly by retarded cretins who pass their communal single emaciated brain cell to one another via a slow motion baton relay race. And yet they still best us. These people who were not good enough to get pupillages themselves because they were too crap to get into decent universities or get a decent degree and who all slope of to become solicitor-inadequates. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This from Geeklawyer (absolutely not for the faint hearted or easily offended): Our profession is being dismantled slowly by retarded cretins who pass their communal single emaciated brain cell to one another via a slow motion baton relay race. And yet they still best us. These people who were not good enough to get pupillages themselves because they were too crap to get into decent universities or get a decent degree and who all slope of to become solicitor-inadequates. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
