Comments on: Caption competition 2

By: Geeklawyer

Geeklawyer — Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:48:00 +0000

I think it kinder to you not to introduce the topic of your intellect in this post. And you would be wiser not to incite me to do so. (’Uh.’)

Ruthie — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 22:26:04 +0000

uh I think you’ll find torture is far more effective with a blunt instrument..

Nick L Dime — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 17:47:50 +0000

â€˜Geeklawyer tries to sneak a casual peak at the Bar Councilâ€™s CCTV drone thatâ€™s been following him for the last 15 minutesâ€™

Nick L Dime — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 13:39:43 +0000

‘Geeklawyer tries to sneak a casual peak at the Bar Council’s CCTV drone that’s been following for the last 15 minutes’

Geeklawyer — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 08:07:25 +0000

I think we’ve both agreed that that is indeed your problem

But you can’t blame me for trying to recruit an uber-babe who can write too - you’re just here as eye candy

Ruthie — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 23:27:06 +0000

I credit Becky with more intelligence than that. I’m just gullible.

Geeklawyer — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:19:59 +0000

Becky! , wow!

I’ll see if I can persuade Ruthie to second my vote for you to be the winner

Now all I have to do is get you to write for me.

Becky — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 22:10:27 +0000

Eegads! Is that the hour? I appear to be slipping through a hole in the fabric of spacetime…

Dan — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:11:45 +0000

“Arrrgh I can feel the rage virus setting in!!!”

GeekLawyer’s Blog » solicitor advocates may not wear wigs — Wed, 06 Jun 2007 21:04:06 +0000

[…] Ruthie comes after him with her teaspoon, no, it was not Geeklawyer and in any event she also qualified as a barrister so an adverse change […]