Comments on: Random fire 2 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:00:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Alex http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12715 Alex Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:20:11 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12715 Give or take a century or two :mrgreen: Give or take a century or two :mrgreen:

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12703 Geeklawyer Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:35:29 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12703 Yes, or at least very close to that. :razz: Yes, or at least very close to that. :razz:

]]> By: Alex http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12698 Alex Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:02:43 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12698 GL's Myspace page says he's 29 years old. Yeah right! :twisted: GL’s Myspace page says he’s 29 years old. Yeah right! :twisted:

]]> By: Martin http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12337 Martin Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:09:58 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12337 If you look at mine (whilst logged out) you will see my "public profile". If you were Web 2.0 savvy, then you would have set your account to show such a limited public profile to non-Facebook members. Smarty pants right back at ya! :roll: If you look at mine (whilst logged out) you will see my “public profile”. If you were Web 2.0 savvy, then you would have set your account to show such a limited public profile to non-Facebook members.

Smarty pants right back at ya! :roll:

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12336 Geeklawyer Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:36:48 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12336 Ha! Now, you see? smarty pants. That URL doesn't work! Rather it doesn't work unless you have a Facebook account and that you are logged in. Joe Punter cannot browse into the Facebook network to see it. One assumes this to be a deliberate design decision on their part, but frankly it is so fucked up and unusable I wonder if they asked Ruthie for advice! You ought to be able to see me and then decide to join, or at least see me from that url. Why the hell don't Web 2.0 people consult me first? Ha! Now, you see? smarty pants. That URL doesn’t work! Rather it doesn’t work unless you have a Facebook account and that you are logged in. Joe Punter cannot browse into the Facebook network to see it.

One assumes this to be a deliberate design decision on their part, but frankly it is so fucked up and unusable I wonder if they asked Ruthie for advice! You ought to be able to see me and then decide to join, or at least see me from that url.

Why the hell don’t Web 2.0 people consult me first?

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12335 Geeklawyer Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:17:18 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12335 But darling remember the Ruthie motto: "fuck it". But darling remember the Ruthie motto: “fuck it”.

]]> By: Martin http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12334 Martin Sat, 02 Jun 2007 18:10:41 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12334 Facebook URL: http://www.facebook.com/p/Geek-Lawyer/720931860 Then, because that's far too complicated, redirect a sub-domain to it; e.g. http://facebook.martingeorge.org People will no doubt see that I am far more popular, and rightly so. Facebook URL: http://www.facebook.com/p/Geek-Lawyer/720931860

Then, because that’s far too complicated, redirect a sub-domain to it; e.g. http://facebook.martingeorge.org

People will no doubt see that I am far more popular, and rightly so.

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12305 Ruthie Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:37:07 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12305 So true Charon...normally you have to clean out the client account and run off to Barabados with your mistress to get this much coverage in the Gazette. I've warned Rupert that if they publish any more pictures of me anytime soon people will think I'm screwing the editor. But then Rupert told that the editor has just been sacked. So all that effort was a waste of time then. :mrgreen: So true Charon…normally you have to clean out the client account and run off to Barabados with your mistress to get this much coverage in the Gazette. I’ve warned Rupert that if they publish any more pictures of me anytime soon people will think I’m screwing the editor. But then Rupert told that the editor has just been sacked. So all that effort was a waste of time then. :mrgreen:

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12303 Geeklawyer Sat, 02 Jun 2007 05:10:53 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12303 No, I amended the article after your comment. Don't bother with the MySpace page: it's traffic bait. I value it so little I have given Ruthie full admin rights. No, I amended the article after your comment. Don’t bother with the MySpace page: it’s traffic bait. I value it so little I have given Ruthie full admin rights.

]]> By: Charon QC http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12290 Charon QC Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:45:14 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/06/01/random-fire-2/#comment-12290 GL... there is a great pic of you on the new Ministry of Justice website... you want to claim moral rights over this one, mate... and, possibly, international syndication rights... and, if you were in France... claim breach of privacy. I really am sorry... I really didn't mean to send that pic to Charlie.... GL… there is a great pic of you on the new Ministry of Justice website… you want to claim moral rights over this one, mate… and, possibly, international syndication rights… and, if you were in France… claim breach of privacy.

I really am sorry… I really didn’t mean to send that pic to Charlie….

]]>