Comments on: quickfire 2 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:32:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11838 Geeklawyer Sun, 27 May 2007 08:38:36 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11838 Ah you'll never need to worry about definitions of 'suitable' then since the cases will never arise. :razz: Ah you’ll never need to worry about definitions of ’suitable’ then since the cases will never arise. :razz:

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11836 Ruthie Sun, 27 May 2007 08:31:02 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11836 "suitable" will be interpreted in each application on a case by case basis.. “suitable” will be interpreted in each application on a case by case basis..

]]> By: geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11340 geeklawyer Thu, 24 May 2007 10:32:36 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11340 I Think ruthie likes the idea of being taken up the isle very much :razz: I Think ruthie likes the idea of being taken up the isle very much :razz:

]]> By: Fanboy http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11339 Fanboy Thu, 24 May 2007 10:25:52 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11339 If the happy occasion went ahead, would there be a calendar with pictures of Ruthie being taken up the aisle? That would sell millions! If the happy occasion went ahead, would there be a calendar with pictures of Ruthie being taken up the aisle? That would sell millions!

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11301 Geeklawyer Thu, 24 May 2007 00:30:40 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11301 Define 'suitable' :smile: Define ’suitable’ :smile:

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11273 Ruthie Wed, 23 May 2007 17:58:43 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11273 but in the absence of any suitable offers the dress is going on Ebay and the proceeds spent on Ruthie's motorcycle :smile: but in the absence of any suitable offers the dress is going on Ebay and the proceeds spent on Ruthie’s motorcycle :smile:

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11270 Ruthie Wed, 23 May 2007 17:42:21 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11270 Dress was a competition prize. Ruthie is self-financing. :mrgreen: Dress was a competition prize. Ruthie is self-financing. :mrgreen:

]]> By: Dan Hull http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11269 Dan Hull Wed, 23 May 2007 17:30:16 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11269 Not fixed yet--despite public demand for same. So the dress if not Ruthie is paid for, right? Eating seriously aged what? Miss Haversham: old cake, undraw the curtains, let in the light, Pip-Pip. Not fixed yet–despite public demand for same. So the dress if not Ruthie is paid for, right? Eating seriously aged what? Miss Haversham: old cake, undraw the curtains, let in the light, Pip-Pip.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11266 Geeklawyer Wed, 23 May 2007 16:53:16 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11266 I see you as less of a married woman and more of a <a href="http://catrinosborne.com/images/wed1.jpg" rel="nofollow">Miss Haversham</a> character. 65 years old sitting a room that hasn't been cleaned for two decades in your £3000 wedding dress. Eating seriously aged wedding cake. I see you as less of a married woman and more of a Miss Haversham character.

65 years old sitting a room that hasn’t been cleaned for two decades in your £3000 wedding dress. Eating seriously aged wedding cake.

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11262 Ruthie Wed, 23 May 2007 16:19:18 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/20/quickfire-2/#comment-11262 Bizarrely Ruthie has just won a £3000 wedding dress in a competition. Now all she needs is a man to marry. Dan: how are you fixed? Bizarrely Ruthie has just won a £3000 wedding dress in a competition. Now all she needs is a man to marry. Dan: how are you fixed?

]]>