<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lawblog 2007 report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Not approved by HM Government&#8230; so no need for a referendum&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-18077</link>
		<dc:creator>Not approved by HM Government&#8230; so no need for a referendum&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 19:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-18077</guid>
		<description>[...] Not approved by HM Government&#8230; so no need for a&#160;referendum&#8230;  Posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 by charonqc   Geeklawyer and Ruthie (founders of the First UK Lawyer&#8217;s Blawging Conference - which I did manage to find) appear to be holding a drinks party for UK blawgersÂ  this Monday - 22nd October - (all welcome) at different locations in London.Â  First UK Blawger&#8217;s Conference Report by Geeklawyer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Not approved by HM Government&#8230; so no need for a&nbsp;referendum&#8230;  Posted on Friday, October 19, 2007 by charonqc   Geeklawyer and Ruthie (founders of the First UK Lawyer&#8217;s Blawging Conference - which I did manage to find) appear to be holding a drinks party for UK blawgersÂ  this Monday - 22nd October - (all welcome) at different locations in London.Â  First UK Blawger&#8217;s Conference Report by Geeklawyer [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10825</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10825</guid>
		<description>"It's nothing. No really it's nothing."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s nothing. No really it&#8217;s nothing.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10823</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10823</guid>
		<description>Gosh, thank you for your generosity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, thank you for your generosity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And so it came to pass... &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10822</link>
		<dc:creator>And so it came to pass... &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the blawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 19:52:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10822</guid>
		<description>[...] And so the day arrived for LawBlog2007 (re-named the first European Law Bloggers Conference after drinks in the Pub after the event) The event was very well organised with CPA Global, the hosts, through Charlotte, providing superb facilities and generous hospitality. The Law Society Gazette and Freeth Cartwright sponsored the event and rather than provide a review, I refer you to and commend the reviews on Geeklawyer! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] And so the day arrived for LawBlog2007 (re-named the first European Law Bloggers Conference after drinks in the Pub after the event) The event was very well organised with CPA Global, the hosts, through Charlotte, providing superb facilities and generous hospitality. The Law Society Gazette and Freeth Cartwright sponsored the event and rather than provide a review, I refer you to and commend the reviews on Geeklawyer! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; quickfire 2</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10816</link>
		<dc:creator>GeekLawyer&#8217;s Blog &#187; quickfire 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 16:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10816</guid>
		<description>[...] Skip navigation    &#171; Lawblog 2007 report [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Skip navigation    &laquo; Lawblog 2007 report [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10778</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10778</guid>
		<description>BTW I'm not reviewing any of your past posts only exercising editorial review of future ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW I&#8217;m not reviewing any of your past posts only exercising editorial review of future ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10775</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 08:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10775</guid>
		<description>large and expensive ?
I'll do large if you like - but expensive? OK £10/20, whatever it takes to make you happy (short of my grisly death)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>large and expensive ?<br />
I&#8217;ll do large if you like - but expensive? OK £10/20, whatever it takes to make you happy (short of my grisly death)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10754</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10754</guid>
		<description>As for the pink leathers; I prefer to maintain a degree of mystique, and that particular vision of glory must remain in certain fevered imaginations...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the pink leathers; I prefer to maintain a degree of mystique, and that particular vision of glory must remain in certain fevered imaginations&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10753</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 01:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10753</guid>
		<description>Having spoken about co-bloggers Geeklawyer suddenly decided last night he ought to practice what he preaches and withdraw Ruthie's full posting rights and review all her posts. Curious since Ruthie has been happily posting for the last 18 months, and of course absolutely nothing to do with the possibility that judging be her reception at  the conference, Ruthie might be getting to be almost as popular as Geeklawyer...

Geeklawyer clearly sensed a force 10 Princess Ruthie reaction brewing and to pre-empt this has offered to buy Ruthie a large and expensive present.

Is Ruthie the kind of shallow self interested individual who would be appeased and placated by such a gesture?

You bettcha. :mrgreen:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having spoken about co-bloggers Geeklawyer suddenly decided last night he ought to practice what he preaches and withdraw Ruthie&#8217;s full posting rights and review all her posts. Curious since Ruthie has been happily posting for the last 18 months, and of course absolutely nothing to do with the possibility that judging be her reception at  the conference, Ruthie might be getting to be almost as popular as Geeklawyer&#8230;</p>
<p>Geeklawyer clearly sensed a force 10 Princess Ruthie reaction brewing and to pre-empt this has offered to buy Ruthie a large and expensive present.</p>
<p>Is Ruthie the kind of shallow self interested individual who would be appeased and placated by such a gesture?</p>
<p>You bettcha. <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif' alt=':mrgreen:' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LawBlog 2007 &#171; Legal Scribbles</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10722</link>
		<dc:creator>LawBlog 2007 &#171; Legal Scribbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2007 18:59:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/05/19/lawblog-2007-report/#comment-10722</guid>
		<description>[...]  As the legal blogging world knows, CPA Global played host to LawBlog 2007 last Friday. By all accounts, it went very well indeed. Except I boobed somewhat. In her post on the event, Ruthie ominously [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  As the legal blogging world knows, CPA Global played host to LawBlog 2007 last Friday. By all accounts, it went very well indeed. Except I boobed somewhat. In her post on the event, Ruthie ominously [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
