<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legal Bookshopping</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2557</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2557</guid>
		<description>I'd rather fight Minor Junior, but would it be cruel to batter a  [Minor Junior's nationality] with a justifisble inferiority complex?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather fight Minor Junior, but would it be cruel to batter a  [Minor Junior&#8217;s nationality] with a justifisble inferiority complex?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2556</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2556</guid>
		<description>Dan fight Martin?: that sounds as likely as two jews fighting over a pork sandwich.

Not that I am suggesting that you are in any way way porcine, or grotesquely fat, or blubbery or double chinned and riddled with cellulite, or that you have a beer gut to rival a darts player.


No. Some of us like a bit of pork scratching with a beer or two...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan fight Martin?: that sounds as likely as two jews fighting over a pork sandwich.</p>
<p>Not that I am suggesting that you are in any way way porcine, or grotesquely fat, or blubbery or double chinned and riddled with cellulite, or that you have a beer gut to rival a darts player.</p>
<p>No. Some of us like a bit of pork scratching with a beer or two&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2553</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2553</guid>
		<description>Or maybe Dan could fight Martin for me :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe Dan could fight Martin for me <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2552</guid>
		<description>OK readers, Ruthie is selling tickets for the Martin v GL fight. Dare I suggest that GL is rather better at giving it out than taking it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK readers, Ruthie is selling tickets for the Martin v GL fight. Dare I suggest that GL is rather better at giving it out than taking it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2551</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2551</guid>
		<description>No. It's OK Martin I'm not an academic - so I do't feel inadequate :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. It&#8217;s OK Martin I&#8217;m not an academic - so I do&#8217;t feel inadequate <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2542</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2542</guid>
		<description>I feel very flattered by all of this attention. Just because I'm young, stupdendously good-looking and a bit of a genius doesn't mean you have to feel inadequate, geeklawyer...

On second thoughts, maybe you do. Carry on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel very flattered by all of this attention. Just because I&#8217;m young, stupdendously good-looking and a bit of a genius doesn&#8217;t mean you have to feel inadequate, geeklawyer&#8230;</p>
<p>On second thoughts, maybe you do. Carry on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2541</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2541</guid>
		<description>Can LA Ellen &#038; I be bridesmaids?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can LA Ellen &#038; I be bridesmaids?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2540</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2540</guid>
		<description>Dan:

Ruthie is old enough to know that relationships are basically all about compromise and complementary skills.

Ruthie has the reading-writing thing covered. You simply have to supply the beach front property and Porsche 911.

In fact the less you read the better: Ruthies lawyers will draw up the pre-nup.

P.S. Wedding dress on order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan:</p>
<p>Ruthie is old enough to know that relationships are basically all about compromise and complementary skills.</p>
<p>Ruthie has the reading-writing thing covered. You simply have to supply the beach front property and Porsche 911.</p>
<p>In fact the less you read the better: Ruthies lawyers will draw up the pre-nup.</p>
<p>P.S. Wedding dress on order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2534</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 19:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2534</guid>
		<description>Dan,
nah don't marry Ruthie. I'll let you in on a secret: I let her seduce &#038; marry rich lawyers. Then I bump them off and we split the proceeds of the estate while having sex over the departed husbands grave.

It's kinky I agree, but kinda fun. And profitable. We both love you enough not to make you a victim - Martin 'conflictoflaws', however, deserves to die. We can't say why on a public forum ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,<br />
nah don&#8217;t marry Ruthie. I&#8217;ll let you in on a secret: I let her seduce &#038; marry rich lawyers. Then I bump them off and we split the proceeds of the estate while having sex over the departed husbands grave.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s kinky I agree, but kinda fun. And profitable. We both love you enough not to make you a victim - Martin &#8216;conflictoflaws&#8217;, however, deserves to die. We can&#8217;t say why on a public forum &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Hull</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Hull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/29/legal-bookshopping/#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>Ruthie--I know Naked Lunch and Wild Bill, one of the leaders of the Beat Gen, but not the other authors mentioned--so thanks very much. (It's a good thing we didn't meet.)  Will explore them when I am in Florida, where allegedly there are many books still around,  next week protecting the Germans from the Spanish. Tell GL that WAC? is also off the juice and running like a big fast dog.  I don't like TV but do not like SF either.  Should we wed anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruthie&#8211;I know Naked Lunch and Wild Bill, one of the leaders of the Beat Gen, but not the other authors mentioned&#8211;so thanks very much. (It&#8217;s a good thing we didn&#8217;t meet.)  Will explore them when I am in Florida, where allegedly there are many books still around,  next week protecting the Germans from the Spanish. Tell GL that WAC? is also off the juice and running like a big fast dog.  I don&#8217;t like TV but do not like SF either.  Should we wed anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
