<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site visuals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 18:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>I think the consensus so far has been negative on this theme so I'll find new themes to try. Trouble is they have to be hacked about to work on the site, so its a bit of effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the consensus so far has been negative on this theme so I&#8217;ll find new themes to try. Trouble is they have to be hacked about to work on the site, so its a bit of effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1687</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 18:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1687</guid>
		<description>I dont like this format at all. The colour scheme is ikky, and the green thing in the top right hand corner looks like something you'd find in a discarded petri dish.
Sadly I'm too busy at the moment to really get onto Geeklawyers case about it, but I did really like the Bus full of Hippies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont like this format at all. The colour scheme is ikky, and the green thing in the top right hand corner looks like something you&#8217;d find in a discarded petri dish.<br />
Sadly I&#8217;m too busy at the moment to really get onto Geeklawyers case about it, but I did really like the Bus full of Hippies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1681</guid>
		<description>I've added these CPanel redirect:
"Current Redirects
/blog	http://blog.geeklawyer.org	(permanent)

/blog/	http://blog.geeklawyer.org	(permanent)

/blog/comments/feed/	http://blog.geeklawyer.org/comments/feed/	(permanent)

/blog/feed/	http://blog.geeklawyer.org/feed/	(permanent)

/blog/wp-rss2.php	http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-rss2.php	(permanent)"

Not sure if the latter will redirect to a file rather than a directory, but since these get rewritten into Apache .htaccess rules I don't see why not. I'll see no doubt.

Thanks v much Kirit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve added these CPanel redirect:<br />
&#8220;Current Redirects<br />
/blog	<a href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org" rel="nofollow">http://blog.geeklawyer.org</a>	(permanent)</p>
<p>/blog/	<a href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org" rel="nofollow">http://blog.geeklawyer.org</a>	(permanent)</p>
<p>/blog/comments/feed/	<a href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/comments/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/comments/feed/</a>	(permanent)</p>
<p>/blog/feed/	<a href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/feed/</a>	(permanent)</p>
<p>/blog/wp-rss2.php	<a href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-rss2.php" rel="nofollow">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-rss2.php</a>	(permanent)&#8221;</p>
<p>Not sure if the latter will redirect to a file rather than a directory, but since these get rewritten into Apache .htaccess rules I don&#8217;t see why not. I&#8217;ll see no doubt.</p>
<p>Thanks v much Kirit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirit</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1679</guid>
		<description>Just posted the feed links but they've not shown up. I guess that they're held in moderation due to the URLs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just posted the feed links but they&#8217;ve not shown up. I guess that they&#8217;re held in moderation due to the URLs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirit</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1678</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1678</guid>
		<description>The URLs I'm subscribed to are these:

http://geeklawyer.org/blog/comments/feed/

http://geeklawyer.org/blog/wp-rss2.php


The comment feed just went live again (I think RSSOwl does update it's URL in response to a 301 as it should), but the main feed is still dead.

It'd be lovely to have the form re-presented when you forget to type in the anti-spam sum too, but that's a little thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The URLs I&#8217;m subscribed to are these:</p>
<p><a href="http://geeklawyer.org/blog/comments/feed/" rel="nofollow">http://geeklawyer.org/blog/comments/feed/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://geeklawyer.org/blog/wp-rss2.php" rel="nofollow">http://geeklawyer.org/blog/wp-rss2.php</a></p>
<p>The comment feed just went live again (I think RSSOwl does update it&#8217;s URL in response to a 301 as it should), but the main feed is still dead.</p>
<p>It&#8217;d be lovely to have the form re-presented when you forget to type in the anti-spam sum too, but that&#8217;s a little thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, not an acceptable solution. I'll have to sort this out...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, not an acceptable solution. I&#8217;ll have to sort this out&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1669</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1669</guid>
		<description>He's right; current subscribers to your RSS post feed are no longer getting updates. I presume that resubscribing from blog.geeklawyer.org will correct the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s right; current subscribers to your RSS post feed are no longer getting updates. I presume that resubscribing from blog.geeklawyer.org will correct the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1658</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1658</guid>
		<description>Curious. I have permanent redirects in place. Everything from geeklawyer.org/blog should now point here. Which feed/s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious. I have permanent redirects in place. Everything from geeklawyer.org/blog should now point here. Which feed/s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirit</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1657</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1657</guid>
		<description>Your feeds have been broken for quite some time now. If the URIs have changed you should drop in a 301 re-direct to the new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your feeds have been broken for quite some time now. If the URIs have changed you should drop in a 301 re-direct to the new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1640</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/17/site-visuals/#comment-1640</guid>
		<description>I agree Martin, its way too boring and business like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Martin, its way too boring and business like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
