<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good heavens! Geeklawyer is profane.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1055</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1055</guid>
		<description>I was thinking more '1984' rather than 'Ch4'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking more &#8216;1984&#8242; rather than &#8216;Ch4&#8242;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 21:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>Big Brother? If we all dont mention it, dont watch it and generally display the uninterest that this voyeurism that is passed off as entertainment deserves, then the advertisers will stop giving them money and they'll take it off air.

If I want to watch people cavorting in private I can go lurk in flowerbeds and peak into their front rooms. Fortunately I have more interesting things to do with my life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Brother? If we all dont mention it, dont watch it and generally display the uninterest that this voyeurism that is passed off as entertainment deserves, then the advertisers will stop giving them money and they&#8217;ll take it off air.</p>
<p>If I want to watch people cavorting in private I can go lurk in flowerbeds and peak into their front rooms. Fortunately I have more interesting things to do with my life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1054</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1054</guid>
		<description>I've gone on a virtual holiday to escape big brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve gone on a virtual holiday to escape big brother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1053</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 19:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1053</guid>
		<description>Odd. This comes up as Germany but I think this is a James from the UK. Odd.

Flirting? strewth. You see us when we fight off blog: knives broken bottles, karate, everything ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Odd. This comes up as Germany but I think this is a James from the UK. Odd.</p>
<p>Flirting? strewth. You see us when we fight off blog: knives broken bottles, karate, everything &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1045</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1045</guid>
		<description>Will you two stop flirting now please....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will you two stop flirting now please&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>There's not much skiing at 1am in the morning in Austria. I had assumed you'd understood that ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s not much skiing at 1am in the morning in Austria. I had assumed you&#8217;d understood that &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Touche?!

I see your swordsmanship skills rival your advocacy ones ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touche?!</p>
<p>I see your swordsmanship skills rival your advocacy ones &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1050</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1050</guid>
		<description>As opposed to you giving out advice for free.

Then not doing the work for the people that are paying you.

Touche.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As opposed to you giving out advice for free.</p>
<p>Then not doing the work for the people that are paying you.</p>
<p>Touche.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>Hmm. I seem to recall you have some clients to attend to. Or some ski-ing to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. I seem to recall you have some clients to attend to. Or some ski-ing to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/03/05/good-heavens-geeklawyer-is-profane/#comment-1048</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=256#comment-1048</guid>
		<description>They probably have picked up the weird idea that you are a criminal law expert. Obviously silly to you and I but these are desperate people. What else could get them to ask you for advice?


Strangely, When they ask me for advice on complex points of IP, shipping, e-commerce, tax or corporate law I usually manage to oblige. *shrug*: funny that. I suppose it's 'cos criminal law is much more difficult. But hey, I guess that's why you make Â£12 an hour ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They probably have picked up the weird idea that you are a criminal law expert. Obviously silly to you and I but these are desperate people. What else could get them to ask you for advice?</p>
<p>Strangely, When they ask me for advice on complex points of IP, shipping, e-commerce, tax or corporate law I usually manage to oblige. *shrug*: funny that. I suppose it&#8217;s &#8216;cos criminal law is much more difficult. But hey, I guess that&#8217;s why you make Â£12 an hour &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
