Comments on: Fat dogs http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/01/13/fat-dogs/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:12:34 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/01/13/fat-dogs/#comment-348 Ruthie Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:29:15 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=112#comment-348 Yes. Frightening isn't it. Maybe the attraction is that dogs provide unconditional love and don't answer back, so we can assume they think and feel anything we want them to. It's not like they're going to contradict. They therefore become psychological extensions of ourselves which is why we love them so much Yes. Frightening isn’t it. Maybe the attraction is that dogs provide unconditional love and don’t answer back, so we can assume they think and feel anything we want them to. It’s not like they’re going to contradict. They therefore become psychological extensions of ourselves which is why we love them so much

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2007/01/13/fat-dogs/#comment-347 Geeklawyer Sat, 13 Jan 2007 23:22:42 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=112#comment-347 <i>Surely the threshold for cruelty to children cannot now be lower that that for dogs?</i> Would it be a cliche to repeat the old saw that the English are fonder of their dogs than their children? Surely the threshold for cruelty to children cannot now be lower that that for dogs?

Would it be a cliche to repeat the old saw that the English are fonder of their dogs than their children?

]]>