<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Geeklawyer Xmas speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 23:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=192#comment-636</guid>
		<description>That's the first bit of spam to get through. Damn. But at least it was trackback spam and not comment spam getting past the filters. May see if I can disable trackbacks - pain if I haver to do that. Grrr.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the first bit of spam to get through. Damn. But at least it was trackback spam and not comment spam getting past the filters. May see if I can disable trackbacks - pain if I haver to do that. Grrr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirit</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:47:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=192#comment-635</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, that's a clever spam.

Instead of giving your actual spam message give some cryptographic hash of it. Anybody with a couple of spare supercomputers and the right algorithms will sort it out in double quick time and the rest of us poor gits only get to see a string of random hex digits.

Most brilliant.

As ever Geeklawyer is at the cutting front of cryptospam. BTW, Geeklawyer, when you decode it can you tell us if it was for Viagra or Cialis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, that&#8217;s a clever spam.</p>
<p>Instead of giving your actual spam message give some cryptographic hash of it. Anybody with a couple of spare supercomputers and the right algorithms will sort it out in double quick time and the rest of us poor gits only get to see a string of random hex digits.</p>
<p>Most brilliant.</p>
<p>As ever Geeklawyer is at the cutting front of cryptospam. BTW, Geeklawyer, when you decode it can you tell us if it was for Viagra or Cialis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/#comment-634</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=192#comment-634</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;much of the content of this blog is inaccurate and misleading and on occasion just wrong; &lt;/i&gt;
Good grief Ruthie. Do you think our readers are fools who need to be told this? 

As for a larger motorbike, you should recall that size is not important; it's how well you get ridden that matters. And even though your QC has a fleet of motorbikes its quality not quantity that matters.
 
Swankier chambers, though, I'll concede.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>much of the content of this blog is inaccurate and misleading and on occasion just wrong; </i><br />
Good grief Ruthie. Do you think our readers are fools who need to be told this? </p>
<p>As for a larger motorbike, you should recall that size is not important; it&#8217;s how well you get ridden that matters. And even though your QC has a fleet of motorbikes its quality not quantity that matters.</p>
<p>Swankier chambers, though, I&#8217;ll concede.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=192#comment-632</guid>
		<description>I'd be more upset, if I wasn't laughing so much...

Ruthie doesn't want to get into an extended discussion about her love life, and readers should be aware that much of the content of this blog is inaccurate and misleading and on occassion just wrong; so please do not act on reliance on any of the contents as no liability will be accepted.

Ruthie is more than delighted if rumours abound that she is dating a High Court Judge. ("Lady Ruthie" yeah quite fancy that). Perhaps she will then get less professional aggravation. 

There is a new male presence in Ruthie's life, and since he appears to be developing a blog presence, hereafter to be known as "tofflawyer". Suffice to say he has swankier chambers and a bigger motorbike than Geeklawyer. But whilst Ruthie is basically a socialist she has previously noted the effect of competition to improve the general quality of services available :-)

Ruthie's relationships are, however, notoriously shortlived so whether tofflawyer will make it to the end of the new year remains to be seen.

Ruthie doubts that tofflawyer will be persuaded to contribute to blog, busy as he is with parting waves, turning law books into solid gold etc etc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be more upset, if I wasn&#8217;t laughing so much&#8230;</p>
<p>Ruthie doesn&#8217;t want to get into an extended discussion about her love life, and readers should be aware that much of the content of this blog is inaccurate and misleading and on occassion just wrong; so please do not act on reliance on any of the contents as no liability will be accepted.</p>
<p>Ruthie is more than delighted if rumours abound that she is dating a High Court Judge. (&#8221;Lady Ruthie&#8221; yeah quite fancy that). Perhaps she will then get less professional aggravation. </p>
<p>There is a new male presence in Ruthie&#8217;s life, and since he appears to be developing a blog presence, hereafter to be known as &#8220;tofflawyer&#8221;. Suffice to say he has swankier chambers and a bigger motorbike than Geeklawyer. But whilst Ruthie is basically a socialist she has previously noted the effect of competition to improve the general quality of services available <img src='http://blog.geeklawyer.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Ruthie&#8217;s relationships are, however, notoriously shortlived so whether tofflawyer will make it to the end of the new year remains to be seen.</p>
<p>Ruthie doubts that tofflawyer will be persuaded to contribute to blog, busy as he is with parting waves, turning law books into solid gold etc etc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charon QC</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/12/26/the-geeklawyer-xmas-speech/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator>Charon QC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 18:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=192#comment-633</guid>
		<description>Happy new Year Geeklawyer... I was alerted to this peroration and Mead Moment by a pingback.  It would seem that I have too much time on my hands over Christmas.  i dine tonight with a lovely woman - so will eat something sensible.
Ruthie seems to be on the rampage from what you say...

Have a good evening...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy new Year Geeklawyer&#8230; I was alerted to this peroration and Mead Moment by a pingback.  It would seem that I have too much time on my hands over Christmas.  i dine tonight with a lovely woman - so will eat something sensible.<br />
Ruthie seems to be on the rampage from what you say&#8230;</p>
<p>Have a good evening&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
