Comments on: Episode 6: Ruthie’s podcast http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/ A barrister gossips & rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:02:14 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Dan Hull http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-566 Dan Hull Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:24:09 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-566 "You can leave your hat on...", Tom Jones sang. “You can leave your hat on…”, Tom Jones sang.

]]> By: Charon QC http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-565 Charon QC Tue, 28 Nov 2006 22:07:07 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-565 Ruthie... excellent.... You may get more hits than geeklawyer because you wear a Hat!. dan.. take note.. Like the music playing in the background... and Geeklawyer sound effects...quite special! Bravura debut... at least you didn't bowl the bowl straight to second slip! Ruthie… excellent.… You may get more hits than geeklawyer because you wear a Hat!. dan.. take note..

Like the music playing in the background… and Geeklawyer sound effects…quite special!

Bravura debut… at least you didn’t bowl the bowl straight to second slip!

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-564 Geeklawyer Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:22:31 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-564 "the bird next door" - hmm, yes; not far off the mark - that language is suggesting a girl who is accessible, average & unexciting; a dalliance to pass the time while looking for someone more glamorous. And 'Bird' suggests the quaint 70's England of Carry on Camping films. Ruthie as Barbara Windsor. "Nice voice": errr, yeeesss. ok... "Yanks will want more of her": Sure, I can Fedex bits of her to any location in the US. Rump? Breast? “the bird next door” — hmm, yes; not far off the mark — that language is suggesting a girl who is accessible, average & unexciting; a dalliance to pass the time while looking for someone more glamorous. And ‘Bird’ suggests the quaint 70’s England of Carry on Camping films. Ruthie as Barbara Windsor.

“Nice voice”: errr, yeeesss. ok…

“Yanks will want more of her”: Sure, I can Fedex bits of her to any location in the US. Rump? Breast?

]]> By: Ruthie http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-562 Ruthie Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:00:54 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-562 Thanks Mary. I am encouraged to buy a Mac and make the take over complete. Dan: you are a sick man and need help. Hat???!!! I like the "sounds slightly like the girl next door" review on your site. Uh, I think thats a compliment. Still I'm delighted to be popular in the states, I'll have Hollywood agents ringing me up next. I'll allow Geeklawyer to negotiate my contract as long as he doesn't take too much of a cut :-) P.S. For the avoidance of doubt, I am not Geeklwayers "bird". Well in his dreams maybe. Thanks Mary. I am encouraged to buy a Mac and make the take over complete.

Dan: you are a sick man and need help. Hat???!!!
I like the “sounds slightly like the girl next door” review on your site. Uh, I think thats a compliment. Still I’m delighted to be popular in the states, I’ll have Hollywood agents ringing me up next. I’ll allow Geeklawyer to negotiate my contract as long as he doesn’t take too much of a cut :-)

P.S. For the avoidance of doubt, I am not Geeklwayers “bird”. Well in his dreams maybe.

]]> By: Geeklawyer http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-563 Geeklawyer Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:36:20 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-563 Dan: I can see you will not be satisfed until I have coerced Ruthie into a skimpy outfit of some sort: either a schoolgirl outfit or a french maid outfit. I will risk a sexual harassment lawsuit & make such a request for some future podcast. Maryte: I can understand Ruthie's fan club saying such things but for you to betray me cuts deep and hard. sniff. But, think about it, what earthly interest could a Ruthie only podcast have? Dan: I can see you will not be satisfed until I have coerced Ruthie into a skimpy outfit of some sort: either a schoolgirl outfit or a french maid outfit. I will risk a sexual harassment lawsuit & make such a request for some future podcast.

Maryte: I can understand Ruthie’s fan club saying such things but for you to betray me cuts deep and hard. sniff. But, think about it, what earthly interest could a Ruthie only podcast have?

]]> By: Mary http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-561 Mary Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:31:48 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-561 Poo! You completely dominated that podcast Mr. Geeklawyer. How about we have a Ruthie-only podcast? Not to say that your voice doesn't have soothing undertones of quiet arrogance, but it would be nice to hear Ruthie. Ruthie, bravo! Contrary to Geeklawyer's attempts at maligning you, you did a superb job. Poo! You completely dominated that podcast Mr. Geeklawyer. How about we have a Ruthie-only podcast?

Not to say that your voice doesn’t have soothing undertones of quiet arrogance, but it would be nice to hear Ruthie.

Ruthie, bravo! Contrary to Geeklawyer’s attempts at maligning you, you did a superb job.

]]> By: Dan Hull http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/comment-page-1/#comment-560 Dan Hull Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:47:34 +0000 http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/27/episode-6-ruthies-podcast/#comment-560 Bravo! Uh, which, if any, outfit? Hat? Bravo! Uh, which, if any, outfit? Hat?

]]>