<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An inconvenient acquittal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/an-inconvenient-acquittal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/an-inconvenient-acquittal/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:56:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/an-inconvenient-acquittal/comment-page-1/#comment-518</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=156#comment-518</guid>
		<description>Could the BNP, or indeed any other group King Tony tries to persecute, not get round any restrictions by simply locating their servers in the US and then directing people to such a website? Surely not even His Arrogance could block access to all overseas servers of which he disapproves. 

If this soluton is needed, t&#039;would be more than ironic that, yet again, The Constitution were needed to protect the political freedom of British subjects from the excesses of their own (British) Government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the BNP, or indeed any other group King Tony tries to persecute, not get round any restrictions by simply locating their servers in the US and then directing people to such a website? Surely not even His Arrogance could block access to all overseas servers of which he disapproves. </p>
<p>If this soluton is needed, t’would be more than ironic that, yet again, The Constitution were needed to protect the political freedom of British subjects from the excesses of their own (British) Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: And life just gets better&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the Blawg from spr-consilio.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/11/an-inconvenient-acquittal/comment-page-1/#comment-517</link>
		<dc:creator>And life just gets better&#8230; &#171; Charon QC&#8230;the Blawg from spr-consilio.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=156#comment-517</guid>
		<description>[...] Interesting article by Geeklawyer - worth a read.Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Interesting article by Geeklawyer — worth a read.Â  […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
