Geeklawyer often wishes he was obscenely rich. Until that glo­ri­ous event comes to hap­pen he will have to set­tle for merely being obscene. And rich.

Buu­uut, then again. Look at Tom Cruise.

No really, do look or this post won’t make any fuck­ing sense.

Tom Cruise is of course a shit actor. And he’s short. The only way he could be worse is if he were a gin­ger. Let’s con­sider some of the films & TV he’s done:

  • Mis­sion Impos­si­ble 1 to 10: bollocks.
  • War of the Worlds: Also bollocks.
  • Austin Pow­ers Gold­mem­ber: Nearly ruined the film and he only had a 2 fem­tosec­ond cameo. So, bol­locks then.
  • Rain Man: A film about a retard and a slimey socio­pathic manip­u­la­tor. No he didn’t play both parts and it wasn’t a biog­ra­phy. It was, how­ever, bollocks.
  • Inter­view with a Vam­pire: it cer­tainly sucked. Bol­locks really.
  • Dick in and the Other Guy: where he played the guy in the closet on the couch. Bol­locks, but — and let me be clear here — not gay bol­locks because Tom has denied being gay. Geeklawyer def­i­nitely believes him.

Geeklawyer hap­pened on a won­der­ful site that par­o­dies the height chal­lenged one. Oddly, Tom Cruise doesn’t quite get the joke and has set his pri­vate reli­gion on them. By which is meant, of course the Sci­en­tol­o­gists ™. This hybrid quack religion/multilevel mar­ket­ing scheme appears to have cropped up in rela­tion to Mr Cruise on a cou­ple of occa­sions. Appar­ently some Hol­ly­wood film fig­ures have been sur­rounded and harangued by groups of weird shouty peo­ple after the said Hol­ly­wood fig­ures had clashed with the Totally Het­ero­sex­ual Homuncu­lous. There may be no con­nec­tion, and Cruise denies any, but it’s an odd coin­ci­dence that Geeklawyer doesn’t entirely buy.

Any­way. His lawyers have sent the site a not entirely pos­i­tive crit­i­cal review:

“You are hereby on notice that the reg­is­tra­tion and use of this domain name in this fash­ion has caused your name to be falsely asso­ci­ated with our client’s reg­is­tered mark, Scientology.

The fact that you have changed one let­ter (“m” instead of “l”) does not pro­tect you from trade­mark infringement.”

The own­ers have declined to sur­ren­der the site and told Mr Cruise:

get a stool, bring it over here, stand on it and throw your best punch at our knees. We can take it”

Geeklawyer’s mother has Alzheimer’s dis­ease and is a bit ga ga. Nor has she ever read a book on law. How­ever on her own and in her debil­i­tated state she could cer­tainly thrash a bus load of Cruise’s shini­est and most expen­sive lawyers in any action for trade­mark infringe­ment pass­ing off or domain hijack­ing. Their case is that rubbish.

Some­times obscene money cre­ates a real­ity bub­ble. It makes tal­ent­less peo­ple humour­less pompous ego­tis­ti­cal and self-important.

Best then that Geeklawyer isn’t obscenely rich: it would be a shame if any of that ever hap­pened to him.