The inimitable and utterly professional What about Clients blog is a total contrast with Geeklawyer’s own tabloid rant; that’s fine, diversity is all. Nonetheless he recently described me as ‘flat out nuts‘. Positively meant, funny and not causing even the mildest offence this is not the first such description. Nonetheless it caused a slight & momentary degree of introspection for Geeklawyer, but in the end he felt that one is what one is.
At a social event long ago a punter of Geeklawyer said to his own client: “meet the maddest lawyer in the UK”. Geeklawyer has moments of insecurity based on such things. No matter.
He intends to briefly explain in a podcast the history of the Inns at some point soon.
Geeklawyer… a well deserved tribute… Dan has also decided to be kind to Charon….
I fear that it is time, now, for me to sleep, perchance to dream…. it has, apart from the cricket, been a good day
A couple of clients have recently described Ruthie as “scary”. I took it as a compliment…
GL–WAC? would be thrilled (common American jargon and hyperbole) to see your Inns of Court history piece if and when you are in the mood. Say hey to Ruthie. The “Maddest Lawyers in US” are court/trial people and do quite well. It’s our job. Dan Hull