<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wow! US Supreme Court rules Guantanamo trials illegal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/29/wow-us-supreme-court-rules-guantanamo-trials-illegal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/29/wow-us-supreme-court-rules-guantanamo-trials-illegal/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer.org/blog &#187; Blog Archive Geeklawyer to be sued for defamation? &#187;</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/29/wow-us-supreme-court-rules-guantanamo-trials-illegal/#comment-1400</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer.org/blog &#187; Blog Archive Geeklawyer to be sued for defamation? &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=463#comment-1400</guid>
		<description>[...] Apparently the Corpulent One objects to a comment that some poster has made to a blog post that I made back in June, i.e. some six months ago. Victims Customers of Sleazyjet, Geeklawyer speculates, would probably be impressed with the promptness of their response and wish that they could get such lightning fast responses in their own dealings with the company; at least, that is, if Geeklawyer&#8217;s own experiences of flying with them are anything to go by. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Apparently the Corpulent One objects to a comment that some poster has made to a blog post that I made back in June, i.e. some six months ago. Victims Customers of Sleazyjet, Geeklawyer speculates, would probably be impressed with the promptness of their response and wish that they could get such lightning fast responses in their own dealings with the company; at least, that is, if Geeklawyer&#8217;s own experiences of flying with them are anything to go by. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digital Life &#187; Stelios Comment</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/29/wow-us-supreme-court-rules-guantanamo-trials-illegal/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Digital Life &#187; Stelios Comment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=463#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>[...] My last post on the delcine of EasyMobile in Holland has courted a very acidic comment from a peter politakis or nicos manoudakis, but the the same comment has been posted on two other sites [here] and [here]. So obviouslt Peter or Nicos doesn&#8217;t like Stelios much. I must stress the comments are his (whoever he is) comments and not mine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] My last post on the delcine of EasyMobile in Holland has courted a very acidic comment from a peter politakis or nicos manoudakis, but the the same comment has been posted on two other sites [here] and [here]. So obviouslt Peter or Nicos doesn&#8217;t like Stelios much. I must stress the comments are his (whoever he is) comments and not mine. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manoudakis</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/29/wow-us-supreme-court-rules-guantanamo-trials-illegal/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>manoudakis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 02:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=463#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;Regretably, while I agree with this commentators disgust with 'Sir' Stelios a number of factual claims were made that I cannot substantiate and which may well be defamatory. While Geeklawyer is happy to act as counsel for others in defamation matters he does not wish to be on the pointy end of a summons himself. Equally he doesn't wish to overly restrict someone else's expression of opinion. He has therefore deleted what he regards as the contentious fact. (And it was posted on the wrong story!)&lt;/em&gt;

&lt;em&gt;- Geeklawyer &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Sir Stelios Knighthood Cover Up
Stelios was granted a knighthood but no journalist has stepped up to the plate to investigate whether it was appropriate to grant a knighthood to a Monaco resident tax exile who is extremely controversial.
In April 1991 when Stelios Haji-Ioannou, was chief executive of his father's business Troodos Shipping, their tanker Haven blew up off Genoa, killing five crew and disgorging up to 50,000 tonnes of crude oil into the sea - arguably the Mediterranean's worst-ever ecological disaster.
The Haven was an elderly tanker, formerly the Amoco Haven, sister ship of the ill-starred Amoco Cadiz that foundered in 1978.  &lt;em&gt;[deleted]&lt;/em&gt; He was acquitted but the case has dragged on ever since with subsequent appeals and demands for compensation thrown out. Environmentalists also must be appalled &lt;em&gt;[deleted] &lt;/em&gt;Is rewarded with a knighthood.
Tax treatment of aviation fuel as opposed to heating oil and petrol.
Inland Revenue investigators must also see the reward as a slap in the face for hard working UK tax payers. &lt;em&gt;[deleted]&lt;/em&gt; And yet he is knighted.

When is a journalist going to make a name for themselves by investigating Stelios thoroughly and expose him? Stelios Haji-Ioannou's success? what success is that? every single business he has started has &lt;em&gt;[deleted].&lt;/em&gt; The only reason easyJet went ok was firstly because his shipping tycoon dad &lt;em&gt;[deleted]&lt;/em&gt; Please tell the world how successful easyInternet, easyCinema, easyCarRentals, easyWatches, easyMobile, easyMusic, easyBus, easyHotel, have been. I can inform you that they have lost a cummulative Â£300,000,000.00 since inception. The only reason he got his knighthood because of &lt;em&gt;[deleted]&lt;/em&gt; the Labour Party it had nothing to do with the queen. As Stelios is a Monaco resident and a tax exile he is only entitled to an honarary knighthood anyway and as soon as the newspapers catch on it will be downgraded. Or if he wants to keep it he can register for UK tax and pay millions to the Inland Revenue!
I am a Greek Cypriot and do not consider Stelios one of us. He does not send one penny of his money to Cyprus and left Cyprus when his family was involved in scandal. He lives in Monaco where he gambles in the casino and sleeps with &lt;em&gt;[deleted].&lt;/em&gt;
Hella pushti malaga</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>Regretably, while I agree with this commentators disgust with &#8216;Sir&#8217; Stelios a number of factual claims were made that I cannot substantiate and which may well be defamatory. While Geeklawyer is happy to act as counsel for others in defamation matters he does not wish to be on the pointy end of a summons himself. Equally he doesn&#8217;t wish to overly restrict someone else&#8217;s expression of opinion. He has therefore deleted what he regards as the contentious fact. (And it was posted on the wrong story!)</em></p>
<p><em>- Geeklawyer </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Sir Stelios Knighthood Cover Up<br />
Stelios was granted a knighthood but no journalist has stepped up to the plate to investigate whether it was appropriate to grant a knighthood to a Monaco resident tax exile who is extremely controversial.<br />
In April 1991 when Stelios Haji-Ioannou, was chief executive of his father&#8217;s business Troodos Shipping, their tanker Haven blew up off Genoa, killing five crew and disgorging up to 50,000 tonnes of crude oil into the sea - arguably the Mediterranean&#8217;s worst-ever ecological disaster.<br />
The Haven was an elderly tanker, formerly the Amoco Haven, sister ship of the ill-starred Amoco Cadiz that foundered in 1978.  <em>[deleted]</em> He was acquitted but the case has dragged on ever since with subsequent appeals and demands for compensation thrown out. Environmentalists also must be appalled <em>[deleted] </em>Is rewarded with a knighthood.<br />
Tax treatment of aviation fuel as opposed to heating oil and petrol.<br />
Inland Revenue investigators must also see the reward as a slap in the face for hard working UK tax payers. <em>[deleted]</em> And yet he is knighted.</p>
<p>When is a journalist going to make a name for themselves by investigating Stelios thoroughly and expose him? Stelios Haji-Ioannou&#8217;s success? what success is that? every single business he has started has <em>[deleted].</em> The only reason easyJet went ok was firstly because his shipping tycoon dad <em>[deleted]</em> Please tell the world how successful easyInternet, easyCinema, easyCarRentals, easyWatches, easyMobile, easyMusic, easyBus, easyHotel, have been. I can inform you that they have lost a cummulative Â£300,000,000.00 since inception. The only reason he got his knighthood because of <em>[deleted]</em> the Labour Party it had nothing to do with the queen. As Stelios is a Monaco resident and a tax exile he is only entitled to an honarary knighthood anyway and as soon as the newspapers catch on it will be downgraded. Or if he wants to keep it he can register for UK tax and pay millions to the Inland Revenue!<br />
I am a Greek Cypriot and do not consider Stelios one of us. He does not send one penny of his money to Cyprus and left Cyprus when his family was involved in scandal. He lives in Monaco where he gambles in the casino and sleeps with <em>[deleted].</em><br />
Hella pushti malaga</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
