<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exciting new forum on the site!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#038; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/#comment-1367</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=452#comment-1367</guid>
		<description>I've never used RoF, and I must say I find the design complex, and difficult to use. I was attracted to this site because it is so simple to use. I suspect the profile of people we get will be different, but my impression is also that people become loyal to sites that they use reguarly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never used RoF, and I must say I find the design complex, and difficult to use. I was attracted to this site because it is so simple to use. I suspect the profile of people we get will be different, but my impression is also that people become loyal to sites that they use reguarly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/#comment-1366</link>
		<dc:creator>Geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=452#comment-1366</guid>
		<description>RoF is good in terms of it's user input but the design is utter crap. Though better to have lots of users and crap software than the other way round, but its early days and time will tell if my forum builds a userbase. I really think mine has more potential though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RoF is good in terms of it&#8217;s user input but the design is utter crap. Though better to have lots of users and crap software than the other way round, but its early days and time will tell if my forum builds a userbase. I really think mine has more potential though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liadnan</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/#comment-1365</link>
		<dc:creator>Liadnan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=452#comment-1365</guid>
		<description>You'll be in competition with the RoF board, but why not..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll be in competition with the RoF board, but why not..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/06/10/exciting-new-forum-on-the-site/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 10:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=452#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>And even better you can get to chat to Ruthie. xxx

I have to begrudgingly admit the forum is quite good, and quite funny please do get involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And even better you can get to chat to Ruthie. xxx</p>
<p>I have to begrudgingly admit the forum is quite good, and quite funny please do get involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
