<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crushed blackberries?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/02/24/crushed-blackberries/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/02/24/crushed-blackberries/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vendorprisey</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/02/24/crushed-blackberries/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Vendorprisey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=394#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>[...] GeeklawyerÂ (Another good law blog &#8212;Â blawg)Â mentioned a similar thing when discussing the Blackberry case. The adverse policy implications of patents are often rather hard to communicate to the public. The appalling state of the American Patent Office is generally of interest to no-one but digital rights activists patentees and their lawyers. The Blackberry debacle brings this into profound relief. News coverage seems to consist of large numbers of people all repeating the theme: â€œMy life depends on this. If I canâ€™t get my emails Iâ€™m in real trouble. This could be a personal disasterâ€œ. Geeklawyer suspects that if you told these people that they are in this position because of a weak patent examination procedure caused by a combination of underfunding and policy skewed towards the applicant, as a result of corporate lobbying, they would march to Virginia and torch the place. Assuming, that is, that someone hasnâ€™t already patented public torchings. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] GeeklawyerÂ (Another good law blog &#8212;Â blawg)Â mentioned a similar thing when discussing the Blackberry case. The adverse policy implications of patents are often rather hard to communicate to the public. The appalling state of the American Patent Office is generally of interest to no-one but digital rights activists patentees and their lawyers. The Blackberry debacle brings this into profound relief. News coverage seems to consist of large numbers of people all repeating the theme: â€œMy life depends on this. If I canâ€™t get my emails Iâ€™m in real trouble. This could be a personal disasterâ€œ. Geeklawyer suspects that if you told these people that they are in this position because of a weak patent examination procedure caused by a combination of underfunding and policy skewed towards the applicant, as a result of corporate lobbying, they would march to Virginia and torch the place. Assuming, that is, that someone hasnâ€™t already patented public torchings. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruthie</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2006/02/24/crushed-blackberries/#comment-1240</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruthie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=394#comment-1240</guid>
		<description>Ruthie read somewhere that people have become so obsessive about their e mails that their self esteem suffers when their in box is empty. Its all about a tragic need to be important. But the most important people do not have mobile phones or in boxes...they have people to sort these things. Can you imagine the Queen texting away?

There is still a device called a telephone which is remarkably effective at conveying information. Ruthie wonders if e mail had been invented before the phone then we would all now be ringing each other all day long...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruthie read somewhere that people have become so obsessive about their e mails that their self esteem suffers when their in box is empty. Its all about a tragic need to be important. But the most important people do not have mobile phones or in boxes&#8230;they have people to sort these things. Can you imagine the Queen texting away?</p>
<p>There is still a device called a telephone which is remarkably effective at conveying information. Ruthie wonders if e mail had been invented before the phone then we would all now be ringing each other all day long&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
