<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toys toys toys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2005/10/06/toys-toys-toys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2005/10/06/toys-toys-toys/</link>
	<description>A barrister gossips &#38; rants on intellectual property law, the legal system and civil liberties.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; oooooh!</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2005/10/06/toys-toys-toys/#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer.org &#187; Blog Archive &#187; oooooh!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=316#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>[...] Geeklawyer thought it would never appear. Wrong, it&#8217;s here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Geeklawyer thought it would never appear. Wrong, it&#8217;s here. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geeklawyer</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2005/10/06/toys-toys-toys/#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>geeklawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 16:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=316#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;"... and was told it would NOT be released on time (3rd quarter of this year)..."&lt;/i&gt;
Probably true. Geeklawyer was told by the external company (Open Hands something) doing the development and manning the stall that it was really really, no really, not vapourware and due for release this later &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; year - no firm date given but he got the impression of the 4th Quarter - just in time for Santa's annual act of aggravated trespass.  More than enough time to pad the clients the invoices he thinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;&#8230; and was told it would NOT be released on time (3rd quarter of this year)&#8230;&#8221;</i><br />
Probably true. Geeklawyer was told by the external company (Open Hands something) doing the development and manning the stall that it was really really, no really, not vapourware and due for release this later <i>this</i> year - no firm date given but he got the impression of the 4th Quarter - just in time for Santa&#8217;s annual act of aggravated trespass.  More than enough time to pad the clients the invoices he thinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aL</title>
		<link>http://blog.geeklawyer.org/2005/10/06/toys-toys-toys/#comment-1117</link>
		<dc:creator>aL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 21:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.geeklawyer.org/?p=316#comment-1117</guid>
		<description>aL was wondering if Geeklawer saw the release date for this pretty toy that runs nix as aL covets this product and was told it would NOT be released on time (3rd quarter of this year).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aL was wondering if Geeklawer saw the release date for this pretty toy that runs nix as aL covets this product and was told it would NOT be released on time (3rd quarter of this year).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
